<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">entropy</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Entropy</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Entropy</abbrev-journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Entropy</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1099-4300</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>MDPI</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/e24121740</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">entropy-24-01740</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Canonical Density Matrices from Eigenstates of Mixed Systems <xref rid="fn1-entropy-24-01740" ref-type="fn">&#xA7;</xref></article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Kourehpaz</surname>
            <given-names>Mahdi</given-names>
          </name>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Donsa</surname>
            <given-names>Stefan</given-names>
          </name>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Lackner</surname>
            <given-names>Fabian</given-names>
          </name>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Burgd&#xF6;rfer</surname>
            <given-names>Joachim</given-names>
          </name>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="true">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4876-2875</contrib-id>
          <name>
            <surname>B&#x159;ezinov&#xE1;</surname>
            <given-names>Iva</given-names>
          </name>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
          <xref rid="c1-entropy-24-01740" ref-type="corresp">*</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="editor">
          <name>
            <surname>Robnik</surname>
            <given-names>Marko</given-names>
          </name>
          <role>Academic Editor</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="af1-entropy-24-01740">Institute for Theoretical Physics, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstra&#xDF;e 8-10/136, 1040 Vienna, Austria</aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="c1-entropy-24-01740"><label>*</label>Correspondence: <email>iva.brezinova@tuwien.ac.at</email></corresp>
        <fn id="fn1-entropy-24-01740">
          <label>&#xA7;</label>
          <p>Dedicated to Professor Giulio Casati on the occasion of his 80th birthday.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>29</day>
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>12</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>24</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <elocation-id>1740</elocation-id>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>03</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>04</day>
          <month>11</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>&#xA9; 2022 by the authors.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p>Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>).</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>One key issue of the foundation of statistical mechanics is the emergence of equilibrium ensembles in isolated and closed quantum systems. Recently, it was predicted that in the thermodynamic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm1"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x221E;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) limit of large quantum many-body systems, canonical density matrices emerge for small subsystems from almost all pure states. This notion of canonical typicality is assumed to originate from the entanglement between subsystem and environment and the resulting intrinsic quantum complexity of the many-body state. For individual eigenstates, it has been shown that local observables show thermal properties provided the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis holds, which requires the system to be quantum-chaotic. In the present paper, we study the emergence of thermal states in the regime of a quantum analog of a mixed phase space. Specifically, we study the emergence of the canonical density matrix of an impurity upon reduction from isolated energy eigenstates of a large but finite quantum system the impurity is embedded in. Our system can be tuned by means of a single parameter from quantum integrability to quantum chaos and corresponds in between to a system with mixed quantum phase space. We show that the probability for finding a canonical density matrix when reducing the ensemble of energy eigenstates of the finite many-body system can be quantitatively controlled and tuned by the degree of quantum chaos present. For the transition from quantum integrability to quantum chaos, we find a continuous and universal (i.e., size-independent) relation between the fraction of canonical eigenstates and the degree of chaoticity as measured by the Brody parameter or the Shannon entropy.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>thermal state</kwd>
        <kwd>isolated many-body system</kwd>
        <kwd>quantum chaos</kwd>
        <kwd>quantum integrability</kwd>
        <kwd>canonical density matrix</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>WWTF</funding-source>
          <award-id>MA-14002</award-id>
        </award-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>Austrian Science Fund (FWF)</funding-source>
          <award-id>P 35539-N</award-id>
        </award-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>FWF doctoral college</funding-source>
          <award-id>FWF- W1243 (Solids4Fun)</award-id>
        </award-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>International Max Planck Research School of Advanced Photon Science</funding-source>
          <award-id>IMPRS-APS</award-id>
        </award-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>Vienna Scientific Cluster</funding-source>
          <award-id>VSC3</award-id>
          <award-id>VSC4</award-id>
        </award-group>
        <funding-statement>This research was funded by the WWTF grant MA-14002, the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) grant P 35539-N, the FWF doctoral college Project No. FWF- W1243 (Solids4Fun), as well as the International Max Planck Research School of Advanced Photon Science (IMPRS-APS). Calculations were performed on the Vienna Scientific Cluster (VSC3 and VSC4).</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1-entropy-24-01740">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>As first recognized by Ludwig Boltzmann [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1-entropy-24-01740">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2-entropy-24-01740">2</xref>] &#x201C;molecular&#x201D; chaos lies at the core of the foundation of classical statistical mechanics. Only when the phase space of an isolated mechanical system is structureless can the motion be safely assumed to be ergodic and the equal a priori probability for phase space points on the energy hypersurface, the basic tenet of the microcanonical ensemble, is realized. Moreover, chaotic dynamics is &#x201C;mixing&#x201D;, thereby enforcing the approach to the thermal equilibrium state from &#x201C;almost all&#x201D; out-of-equilibrium initial conditions. While any large isolated system is expected to be described by a microcanonical ensemble, any well-defined small subsystem thereof that is only allowed to exchange energy with the remainder of the large system (referred to as bath or environment in the following) is described by the canonical ensemble. The phase-space density of the subsystem is weighted by the Boltzmann factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm2"><mml:semantics><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm3"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Hamilton function of the subsystem, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm4"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with <italic>T</italic> the temperature imprinted by the environment and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm5"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> the Boltzmann constant. However, when the phase space of the system is not chaotic but rather dominated by regular motion on KAM tori [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3-entropy-24-01740">3</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4-entropy-24-01740">4</xref>], neither ergodicity nor mixing is a priori assured, and thermalization of an initial non-equilibrium state may be elusive. The implicit assumption of classical equilibrium statistical mechanics is that in the limit of a large number of degrees of freedom, chaos is generic for any interacting many-particle system.</p>
      <p>How those concepts translate into quantum physics has remained a topic of great conceptual interest and lively debate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5-entropy-24-01740">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6-entropy-24-01740">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7-entropy-24-01740">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8-entropy-24-01740">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9-entropy-24-01740">9</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10-entropy-24-01740">10</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11-entropy-24-01740">11</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12-entropy-24-01740">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13-entropy-24-01740">13</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14-entropy-24-01740">14</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15-entropy-24-01740">15</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16-entropy-24-01740">16</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17-entropy-24-01740">17</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18-entropy-24-01740">18</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19-entropy-24-01740">19</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20-entropy-24-01740">20</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21-entropy-24-01740">21</xref>]. Renewed interest is stimulated by the experimental accessibility of ultracold quantum gases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22-entropy-24-01740">22</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23-entropy-24-01740">23</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24-entropy-24-01740">24</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25-entropy-24-01740">25</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26-entropy-24-01740">26</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27-entropy-24-01740">27</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28-entropy-24-01740">28</xref>], trapped ions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29-entropy-24-01740">29</xref>], and nano-systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30-entropy-24-01740">30</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31-entropy-24-01740">31</xref>], where many of the underlying concepts became quantitatively accessible in large but finite quantum systems in unprecedented detail. The foundation of thermalization of quantum systems has been pioneered by von Neumann in terms of the quantum ergodic theorem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32-entropy-24-01740">32</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33-entropy-24-01740">33</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34-entropy-24-01740">34</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35-entropy-24-01740">35</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36-entropy-24-01740">36</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37-entropy-24-01740">37</xref>]. Accordingly, the entropy is an increasing function of time and expectation values of generic macroscopic observables for pure states formed by coherent superposition of states within microscopic energy shells converge to that of the microcanonical ensemble provided that the energy spectrum of the system is strictly non-degenerate. Recently, this description of thermal equilibrium states was extended to the notion of canonical typicality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37-entropy-24-01740">37</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38-entropy-24-01740">38</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39-entropy-24-01740">39</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40-entropy-24-01740">40</xref>]. Accordingly, starting from almost any pure state formed by a coherent superposition of energy eigenstates of a large isolated many-body system with eigenenergies within a given energy shell <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm6"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of macroscopically small thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm7"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, the reduction to a small subsystem by tracing out the degrees of freedom of the bath will yield the same reduced density matrix one would obtain from the reduction of the microcanonical density matrix for the entire system. If the bath is sufficiently large and the interactions between the bath and the subsystem sufficiently weak, the reduced density matrix corresponds to the standard canonical density matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm8"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>&#x3C1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>Tr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm9"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> the Hamilton operator of the subsystem. The proof of this canonical typicality invokes the intrinsic randomness of the expansion coefficients of the pure state in terms of entangled subsystem&#x2013;bath states. The latter assumption goes back to the notion of intrinsic quantum complexity of entangled states in large systems put forward already by Schr&#xF6;dinger [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41-entropy-24-01740">41</xref>].</p>
      <p>An alternative approach to thermalization is tied to the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5-entropy-24-01740">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6-entropy-24-01740">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7-entropy-24-01740">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8-entropy-24-01740">8</xref>] first put forward by Landau and Lifshitz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42-entropy-24-01740">42</xref>], stating that basic properties of statistical mechanics can emerge not only from ensemble averages but from typical single wavefunctions. However, the condition under which such an equivalence may emerge has remained open. The more recent formulation of the ETH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5-entropy-24-01740">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6-entropy-24-01740">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7-entropy-24-01740">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8-entropy-24-01740">8</xref>] invokes the notion of quantum chaos and Berry&#x2019;s conjecture. Characteristics of quantum chaos were originally identified in few-degrees of freedom systems whose classical limit exhibits chaos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43-entropy-24-01740">43</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44-entropy-24-01740">44</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45-entropy-24-01740">45</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46-entropy-24-01740">46</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47-entropy-24-01740">47</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48-entropy-24-01740">48</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49-entropy-24-01740">49</xref>]. Nowadays, the notion of quantum chaos is invoked more generally for systems that display the same signatures such as energy level distributions predicted by random matrix theory (RMT) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43-entropy-24-01740">43</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48-entropy-24-01740">48</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50-entropy-24-01740">50</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51-entropy-24-01740">51</xref>] or randomness of wavefunction amplitudes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5-entropy-24-01740">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52-entropy-24-01740">52</xref>] even when a well-defined classically chaotic counterpart is not known. The ETH conjectures that for chaotic systems, the diagonal matrix elements of any generic local observable taken in the energy eigenstate basis are smooth functions of the total energy while the off-diagonal elements are exponentially decreasing randomly fluctuating variables with zero mean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6-entropy-24-01740">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7-entropy-24-01740">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8-entropy-24-01740">8</xref>]. If the ETH is valid for a specific system, individual eigenstates show thermal properties upon reduction to a small subsystem. The ETH has been shown to hold for a large variety of systems without a classical analogue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24-entropy-24-01740">24</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53-entropy-24-01740">53</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54-entropy-24-01740">54</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55-entropy-24-01740">55</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56-entropy-24-01740">56</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57-entropy-24-01740">57</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58-entropy-24-01740">58</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59-entropy-24-01740">59</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60-entropy-24-01740">60</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61-entropy-24-01740">61</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62-entropy-24-01740">62</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63-entropy-24-01740">63</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64-entropy-24-01740">64</xref>]. Deviations from the ETH have been observed for local observables in finite systems of hard-core bosons and spin-less fermions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57-entropy-24-01740">57</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58-entropy-24-01740">58</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65-entropy-24-01740">65</xref>] when the energy level distribution deviates from the Wigner&#x2013;Dyson level statistics of RMT characteristic for chaotic systems.</p>
      <p>In the present paper, we explore the quantitative relationship between thermal properties of reduced density matrices (RDMs) emerging from single isolated eigenstates of the entire system and quantum chaos. More specifically, we want to address the question: Is for large but finite systems quantum chaos a conditio sine qua non for the emergence of the Gibbs ensemble, i.e., the canonical ensemble of the subsystem, from eigenstates of the entire system? Or is quantum entanglement and complexity in these systems itself sufficient to render the reduced density matrix of a small subsystem canonical? To this end, we determine the fraction of canonical density matrices emerging upon reduction from the entire set of eigenstates. We explore the existence of a quantitative relationship between the fraction of eigenstates that upon reduction lead to canonical eigenstates, also termed fraction of canonical eigenstates, and the degree of quantum chaos of the entire system. We unravel the connection between this eigenstate canonicity and quantum chaos by exact diagonalization of a large yet finite mesoscopic quantum system. We emphasize that this measure addresses isolated energy eigenstates of the many-body system, in contrast to coherent superpositions of energy eigenstates from a given energy shell of finite width with random expansion coefficients as invoked in the well-established notion of canonical typicality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37-entropy-24-01740">37</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38-entropy-24-01740">38</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39-entropy-24-01740">39</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40-entropy-24-01740">40</xref>].</p>
      <p>As a prototypical case in point, we consider an itinerant impurity embedded in a spin-polarized Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard system. Unlike impurity models for disordered systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66-entropy-24-01740">66</xref>], our model is fully deterministic. All key ingredients for the realization of the present system, i.e., discrete lattice, tunable interactions, and impurity can be experimentally realized with ultracold fermionic atoms (see, e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67-entropy-24-01740">67</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68-entropy-24-01740">68</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69-entropy-24-01740">69</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70-entropy-24-01740">70</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71-entropy-24-01740">71</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72-entropy-24-01740">72</xref>]). In the present scenario, the impurity serves as a probe or &#x201C;thermometer&#x201D; in the isolated many-body quantum system providing an unambiguous subsystem&#x2013;bath decomposition with tunable coupling strength between subsystem and bath. Moreover, our system features a tunable transition from quantum chaos to quantum integrability without invoking any extrinsic stochasticity or disorder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66-entropy-24-01740">66</xref>]. The fact that the subsystem consists of a distinguishable particle has a number of distinct advantages: The reduced density matrix of the probe is uniquely defined and its properties are basis-independent. No choice of a specific basis for the probe such as the independent-particle basis is involved. Moreover, its canonical RDM approaches a Maxwell&#x2013;Boltzmann rather than a Fermi&#x2013;Dirac distribution for indistinguishable fermions. Its thermal state is thus characterized by a single equilibrium parameter, the temperature <italic>T</italic>, without the need for introducing a chemical potential <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm10"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3BC;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, thereby improving the numerical accuracy of the test of canonicity. We measure the proximity of the reduced density matrix of the impurity to the canonical density matrix and identify a direct and size-independent correlation between the fraction of canonical eigenstates and quantum chaos.</p>
      <p>The paper is structured as follows. In <xref ref-type="sec" rid="sec2-entropy-24-01740">Section 2</xref>, we introduce our impurity-Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard model which serves as a prototypical (sub)system&#x2013;environment model system. Quantitative measures for quantum chaos are introduced in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="sec3-entropy-24-01740">Section 3</xref>. The mapping of spectral properties of this isolated many-body system onto thermal states of the impurity within the framework of the microcanonical and canonical ensembles are discussed in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="sec4-entropy-24-01740">Section 4</xref>. The distance in Liouville space between the reduced density matrix of the impurity and a generic canonical density matrix is analyzed and the relation between the fraction of canonical eigenstates and quantum chaos is established in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="sec5-entropy-24-01740">Section 5</xref>. Concluding remarks are given in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="sec6-entropy-24-01740">Section 6</xref>.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2-entropy-24-01740">
      <title>2. The Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard Model with Impurity</title>
      <p>We investigate a variant of the single-band one-dimensional Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard model which is particularly well suited to study entanglement and quantum correlations between subsystem and its environment or bath. The bath is represented by spin-polarized fermions enforcing single occupancy of sites by bath particles while the distinguishable impurity can occupy any site. Accordingly, the Hamiltonian of the total system is given by
      <disp-formula id="FD1-entropy-24-01740"><label>(1)</label><mml:math id="mm11" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      where the Hamiltonian of the subsystem, i.e., the impurity (I), is
      <disp-formula id="FD2-entropy-24-01740"><label>(2)</label><mml:math id="mm12" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="right"><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced separators="" open="[" close="]"><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2020;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      while the Hamiltonian of the bath is
      <disp-formula id="FD3-entropy-24-01740"><label>(3)</label><mml:math id="mm13" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="right"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:munderover><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced separators="" open="[" close="]"><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2020;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:munderover><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:munderover><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>The interaction between the subsystem and the bath is given by
      <disp-formula id="FD4-entropy-24-01740"><label>(4)</label><mml:math id="mm14" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:munderover><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>The operators <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm15"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm16"><mml:semantics><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2020;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm17"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm18"><mml:semantics><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2020;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) are the creation and annihilation operators of the impurity (bath particles) on site <italic>j</italic> with the anticommutation relations <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm19"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>}</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm20"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>{</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2020;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2020;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>}</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm21"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2020;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>}</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B4;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm22"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>{</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2020;</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2020;</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>}</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The operators <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm23"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2020;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm24"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2020;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> correspond to the number operators of impurity and bath <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm25"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm26"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with occupation numbers <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm27"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm28"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of site <italic>j</italic>, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm29"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm30"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) describes the hopping matrix elements of the impurity (bath particles). The bath particles interact with each other by a nearest-neighbor interaction with strength <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm31"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> while the impurity interacts with the bath particles via an on-site interaction with strength <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm32"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The Hubbard chain has <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm33"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> sites with Dirichlet boundary conditions imposed at the edges. An additional very weak external background potential (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm34"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x226A;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) with on-site matrix element <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm35"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm36"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2026;</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) is applied,
      <disp-formula id="FD5-entropy-24-01740"><label>(5)</label><mml:math id="mm37" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn><mml:mfenced separators="" open="[" close="]"><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      for which we use a linear (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm38"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) or quadratic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm39"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) function in order to remove residual geometric symmetries such that the irreducible state space coincides with the entire state space and symmetry related degeneracies are lifted. Alternative impurity models were recently suggested for the investigation of the ETH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64-entropy-24-01740">64</xref>].</p>
      <p>We solve the system via exact diagonalization to determine all eigenstates and eigenenergies of the entire system. The dimension of the Hilbert space of the system is <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm40"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced separators="" open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac linethickness="0pt"><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm41"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of bath particles. We consider typical half-filling configurations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm42"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The largest <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm43"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> considered is <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm44"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> resulting in a Hilbert space dimension of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm45"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>96,525</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm46"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. We set <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm47"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> which also defines the unit of energy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm48"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the following. The key advantage of the present model is that it allows to control and tune the properties of the bath separately by varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm49"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> while keeping fixed the properties of the subsystem whose reduced density matrix we probe. This clear-cut subsystem&#x2013;bath decomposition allows for the unambiguous probing of the emergence of canonical density matrices, thereby avoiding any ad hoc separation by &#x201C;cutting out&#x201D; of the subsystem which then requires the grand canonical density matrix for an open quantum system since both energy and particles can be exchanged [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65-entropy-24-01740">65</xref>]. Moreover, its thermal state is unambiguously characterized by <italic>T</italic> rather than by <italic>T</italic> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm50"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3BC;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> as for indistinguishable fermions, thereby improving the numerical reliability of the performed tests.</p>
      <p>The present system should be realizable for ultracold fermionic atoms trapped in optical lattices [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28-entropy-24-01740">28</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69-entropy-24-01740">69</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70-entropy-24-01740">70</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71-entropy-24-01740">71</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72-entropy-24-01740">72</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73-entropy-24-01740">73</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74-entropy-24-01740">74</xref>]. All key ingredients required for its realization including tunable interactions and impurity&#x2013;bath mixtures are available in the toolbox of ultracold atomic physics. We note that tuning the nearest-neighbor interaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm51"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> between the atoms in optical lattices to large values in the regime of strong correlations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm52"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2273;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, still poses an experimental challenge which might be overcome in the near future.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3-entropy-24-01740">
      <title>3. Measures of Quantum Chaos</title>
      <p>The present single-band Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard model does not possess an obvious classical counterpart whose phase space consists of regions of regular and/or chaotic motion. Lacking such direct quantum&#x2013;classical correspondence, quantum integrability and quantum chaos in the present system is identified by signatures of the quantum system that have been shown to probe chaotic and regular motion in systems where quantum&#x2013;classical correspondence does prevail. Several measures of quantum chaos have been proposed that are based on either properties of eigenstates or of the spectrum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14-entropy-24-01740">14</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49-entropy-24-01740">49</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58-entropy-24-01740">58</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75-entropy-24-01740">75</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76-entropy-24-01740">76</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77-entropy-24-01740">77</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78-entropy-24-01740">78</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79-entropy-24-01740">79</xref>]. As will be shown below, by tuning <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm53"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, we can continuously tune the entire system from the limit of quantum integrability to the limit of quantum chaos across the transition region of a mixed quantum system in which integrable and chaotic motion coexist and explore its impact on the fraction of eigenstates which upon reduction lead to canonical density matrices. The influence of the continuous transition from quantum integrability to quantum chaos on the thermal state of the subsystem will be explored with the help of the present prototypical system.</p>
      <sec id="sec3dot1-entropy-24-01740">
        <title>3.1. Spectral Measures</title>
        <p>Starting point for analyzing and quantifying quantum chaos by means of spectral statistics is the cumulative spectral function also called the staircase function
        <disp-formula id="FD6-entropy-24-01740"><label>(6)</label><mml:math id="mm54" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x398;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm55"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> are the energy eigenvalues of the entire system, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm56"><mml:semantics><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x398;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Heaviside step function. Its spectral derivative is the density of states (DOS)
        <disp-formula id="FD7-entropy-24-01740"><label>(7)</label><mml:math id="mm57" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>Examples for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm58"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm59"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the present system are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f001">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
        <p>The smoothed &#x201C;average&#x201D; spectral staircase function <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm60"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> fitted to a polynomial of order 10, also shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f001">Figure 1</xref>, provides the reference for spectral unfolding required for certain measures of quantum fluctuations about the (classical) mean. Accordingly, the unfolded energy spectrum is given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm61"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. For systems for which quantum&#x2013;classical correspondence holds, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm62"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the classical phase space volume in units of Planck&#x2019;s constant <italic>h</italic> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm63"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> to the microcanonical energy shell. We note that the saturation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm64"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> observed with increasing <italic>E</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f001">Figure 1</xref>a) or, likewise, the bell-shaped curve for the DOS (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f001">Figure 1</xref>b) decreasing at large <italic>E</italic> is in the present case a consequence of the single-band approximation of the Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard model (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD1-entropy-24-01740">1</xref>)) and, more generally, appears for systems with a spectrum bounded from above. For realistic macroscopic systems, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm65"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm66"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> should generically increase monotonically with <italic>E</italic>. As discussed in more detail below, this non-generic decrease of the density of states observed for the present as well as for other finite and mesoscopic systems has implications for the ensuing thermal properties.</p>
        <p>The probability density <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm67"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the nearest-neighbor level spacings (NNLS), <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm68"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, features distinctively different shapes for quantum integrable and quantum chaotic systems. While for integrable systems, the NNLS have been predicted by Berry and Tabor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50-entropy-24-01740">50</xref>] to feature an exponential (or Poissonian) distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm69"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix">exp</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, for chaotic systems it closely follows random matrix theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43-entropy-24-01740">43</xref>]. In our case of a time-reversal symmetric system, the corresponding random-matrix ensemble is the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble (GOE) which has been shown (see e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46-entropy-24-01740">46</xref>]) to closely follow the Wigner&#x2013;Dyson distribution (or Wigner surmise) given by
        <disp-formula id="FD8-entropy-24-01740"><label>(8)</label><mml:math id="mm70" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>WD</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3C0;</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3C0;</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>A complementary spectral measure first proposed by Gurevich and Pevzner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80-entropy-24-01740">80</xref>] and applied to quantum chaos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81-entropy-24-01740">81</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82-entropy-24-01740">82</xref>] has the advantage that it does not require spectral unfolding but can be applied to the spectral raw data, i.e., the restricted gap ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm71"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD9-entropy-24-01740"><label>(9)</label><mml:math id="mm72" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>min</mml:mi><mml:mfenced separators="" open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm73"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The distribution of restricted gap ratios has been shown to obey for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm74"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xD7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> GOE matrices the analytical prediction
        <disp-formula id="FD10-entropy-24-01740"><label>(10)</label><mml:math id="mm75" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>GOE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>27</mml:mn><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>For chaotic systems, this prediction remains very accurate even for large systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82-entropy-24-01740">82</xref>]. In the limit of quantum integrable systems, the distribution of restricted gap ratios is given by (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81-entropy-24-01740">81</xref>])
        <disp-formula id="FD11-entropy-24-01740"><label>(11)</label><mml:math id="mm76" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>The search for generic spectral measures for the transition regime between the quantum integrable and quantum chaotic limit has remained an open problem. For systems possessing a classical counterpart with a mixed phase space in which integrable and chaotic motion coexist, several models for the NNLS have been proposed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83-entropy-24-01740">83</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84-entropy-24-01740">84</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85-entropy-24-01740">85</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86-entropy-24-01740">86</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87-entropy-24-01740">87</xref>]. Empirically, one of the best fits to spectral data for mixed systems has been provided by a heuristic ansatz suggested by Brody [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88-entropy-24-01740">88</xref>] which allows for a one-parameter smooth interpolation of the NNLS distribution in the transition region between the quantum integrable and quantum chaotic limit,
        <disp-formula id="FD12-entropy-24-01740"><label>(12)</label><mml:math id="mm77" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="right"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where the Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm78"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> characterizes the transition from the integrable (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm79"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the chaotic limit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm80"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <italic>b</italic> follows from the normalization as
        <disp-formula id="FD13-entropy-24-01740"><label>(13)</label><mml:math id="mm81" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="right"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced separators="" open="[" close="]"><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x393;</mml:mi><mml:mfenced separators="" open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>The Brody parameter can be viewed as a measure of the strength of level repulsion between neighboring levels of the quantum system. For mixed few-degrees of freedom systems with a classical analogue, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm82"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> could be identified as a measure for the chaotic fraction of classical phase space [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86-entropy-24-01740">86</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89-entropy-24-01740">89</xref>]. Moreover, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm83"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> has also been found to be directly proportional to the degree of phase-space (de)localization of eigenstates as measured by their Husimi distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77-entropy-24-01740">77</xref>]. The parameterization of the transition from quantum integrability to quantum chaos in terms of a variable exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm84"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> has the salient feature that even for very small but finite <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm85"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm86"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x226A;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm87"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, reflecting the fact that any perturbation of quantum integrability immediately causes level repulsion and suppresses the probability density for any exact degeneracy. We recall that non-degeneracy is one of the key prerequisites of von Neumann&#x2019;s quantum ergodic theorem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32-entropy-24-01740">32</xref>]. We further note that the Hasegawa distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84-entropy-24-01740">84</xref>] sometimes provides an even more accurate fit to the NNLS distribution (see, e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90-entropy-24-01740">90</xref>]), however, at the price of a second adjustable parameter.</p>
        <p>To determine <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm88"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, we fit Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD12-entropy-24-01740">12</xref>) to the data for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm89"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f002">Figure 2</xref>). The quality of the fit is evaluated through the <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm90"><mml:semantics><mml:msup><mml:mi>&#x3C7;</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>-function
        <disp-formula id="FD14-entropy-24-01740"><label>(14)</label><mml:math id="mm91" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>&#x3C7;</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
        which measures the deviation of the distribution of nearest-neighbor spacings <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm92"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> from the Brody distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm93"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> using a bin size of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm94"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. As an additional measure for the uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm95"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, we use the fact that the Brody parameter can be alternatively determined from a fit to the integral <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm96"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x222B;</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> rather than to <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm97"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> itself. The small differences found between the two fits can be used as a measure for the numerical error.</p>
        <p>For <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm98"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and for the linear tilt of the external potential <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm99"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD5-entropy-24-01740">5</xref>)), we observe an excess of (near-) degenerate states as compared to the prediction of the exponential (Poisson) distribution in the first bin at <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm100"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm101"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. This hints at the presence of an only weakly broken symmetry which disappears when using a quadratic tilt. For reasons of consistency, we employ for all <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm102"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> a linear tilt in the following. Neglecting the first bin in the fitting procedure for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm103"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, we obtain <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm104"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and, overall, a very good agreement with the Poisson distribution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f002">Figure 2</xref>a). As the intra-bath interaction is varied from <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm105"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm106"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, we observe a continuous transition from a near Poissonian to an approximate Wigner&#x2013;Dyson NNLS distribution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f002">Figure 2</xref>a&#x2013;c). The Brody parameter monotonically increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm107"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2243;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm108"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm109"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2243;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm110"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. We note that after reaching a plateau at <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm111"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2243;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> near <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm112"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, the Brody parameter decreases again for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm113"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and vanishes in the strongly correlated limit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm114"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x226B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> 1. The decrease of the Brody parameter for large <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm115"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> results from clustering of the energy spectrum in the strongly interacting regime. The bath fragments into clusters of particles with the interactions between separate clusters suppressed. Thus, a partially ordered system emerges reducing the degree of quantum chaoticity. We will focus in the following on the parameter range <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm116"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2264;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> within which the transition from a nearly quantum integrable to a nearly fully quantum chaotic system occurs.</p>
        <p>For the two limiting cases of quantum integrability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm117"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) and quantum chaos (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm118"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the present Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard system, we can also apply the predictions for the restricted gap ratio distribution (Equations (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD10-entropy-24-01740">10</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD11-entropy-24-01740">11</xref>)). We find for these two limiting cases very good agreement between the prediction and the data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f003">Figure 3</xref>), confirming that the identification of quantum integrability and quantum chaos is independent of the particular choice of the spectral measure.</p>
        <p>For the first moment of the restricted gap ratio distribution, we find <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm119"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5284</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm120"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> agreeing to within <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm121"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with the GOE expectation value for asymptotically large matrices <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm122"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>GOE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5307</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82-entropy-24-01740">82</xref>]. Conversely, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm123"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, we find <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm124"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3811</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> in very good agreement with the prediction for a Poisson distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm125"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3863</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. As there is presently no interpolation function <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm126"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> available for the transition between the quantum integrable limit (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD11-entropy-24-01740">11</xref>)) and the quantum chaotic limit (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD10-entropy-24-01740">10</xref>)), we will focus in the following on the Brody distribution for the NNLS as spectral measure for the transition regime.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2-entropy-24-01740">
        <title>3.2. Measures for Wavefunctions</title>
        <p>As an alternative to spectral measures, on can also explore and quantify chaos through the complexity of the eigenstates. According to Berry&#x2019;s conjecture, the eigenstates of a chaotic system feature randomly distributed amplitudes over an appropriate basis, e.g., in quantum billiards, they correspond to randomly distributed plane waves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75-entropy-24-01740">75</xref>]. Following this conjecture, a large number of such measures have been proposed. They include the statistical distribution of eigenvectors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9-entropy-24-01740">9</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12-entropy-24-01740">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46-entropy-24-01740">46</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91-entropy-24-01740">91</xref>], the configuration-space probability distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92-entropy-24-01740">92</xref>], the configuration-space self-avoiding path correlation function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52-entropy-24-01740">52</xref>], the Wigner function-based wavefunction autocorrelation function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75-entropy-24-01740">75</xref>], the inverse participation ratio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93-entropy-24-01740">93</xref>], the Shannon entropy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94-entropy-24-01740">94</xref>], and the phase space localization measured in terms of the information entropy encoded in the Husimi distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77-entropy-24-01740">77</xref>]. One limitation for the quantitative significance of most of these measures (with the possible exception of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77-entropy-24-01740">77</xref>]) is their dependence on the chosen basis of representation. For systems that can be continuously tuned from integrable to chaotic, the eigenstates of the integrable limit suggest themselves as a convenient basis to monitor the transition to chaos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9-entropy-24-01740">9</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12-entropy-24-01740">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58-entropy-24-01740">58</xref>]. For many-body systems, the eigenstates of the mean-field Hamiltonian often provide the reference basis for measuring quantum chaoticity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14-entropy-24-01740">14</xref>]. In the following, we use the eigenstates <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm127"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the integrable system with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm128"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> as a basis for determining the statistical distribution of eigenvectors. From the amplitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm129"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and probabilities <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm130"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, we calculate the Shannon entropy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94-entropy-24-01740">94</xref>] for each eigenstate <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm131"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD15-entropy-24-01740"><label>(15)</label><mml:math id="mm132" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo form="prefix">ln</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>We observe that for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm133"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, the Shannon entropy as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm134"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> forms an inverted parabola-like function with remarkably small eigenstate-to-eigenstate fluctuations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f004">Figure 4</xref>). At the apex near the center of the spectrum, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm135"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> reaches a maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm136"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> close to the GOE limit <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm137"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>GOE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix">ln</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.48</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58-entropy-24-01740">58</xref>] with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm138"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> the dimension of the Hilbert space (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f004">Figure 4</xref>a). States in the tails of the spectrum show strong deviations from this limit as the eigenstates in this region are less complex and do not fulfill the ETH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58-entropy-24-01740">58</xref>]. Best agreement with GOE predictions can therefore be expected near the center of the spectrum at <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm139"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with the highest density of states.</p>
        <p>For smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm140"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f004">Figure 4</xref>b&#x2013;d), the Shanon entropy reveals a significantly diminished complexity of the eigenstates indicated by a reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm141"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and, at the same time, drastically increased state-to-state fluctuations. Probing the generic features of the wavefunctions, we will use the dependence of the scaled Shannon entropy
        <disp-formula id="FD16-entropy-24-01740"><label>(16)</label><mml:math id="mm142" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>GOE</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
        as an alternative wavefunction-based measure of quantum chaoticity complementing the Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm143"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> as spectral measure. Numerically, we determine <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm144"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> by averaging over small intervals of energy and calculating the maximum of the resulting smooth curve.</p>
        <p>Empirically, we find that the dependence of the Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm145"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., the degree of quantum chaoticity on the interaction parameter of the bath particles, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm146"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f005">Figure 5</xref>) can be accurately approximated by
        <disp-formula id="FD17-entropy-24-01740"><label>(17)</label><mml:math id="mm147" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo form="prefix">tanh</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
        with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm148"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm149"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. While a monotonic increase is intuitively expected, the origin of this particularly simple functional form remains to be understood. Remarkably, the evolutions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm150"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm151"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm152"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> closely mirror each other, thereby representing two independent measures of the degree of quantum chaoticity during the transition from integrability to chaos. Overall, the agreement between <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm153"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm154"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> is very good. Residual differences can be viewed as a measure for the residual uncertainty in the quantitative determination of the degree of the eigenstate quantum chaoticity.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4-entropy-24-01740">
      <title>4. The Reduced Density Matrix of the Impurity</title>
      <p>The impurity embedded in the Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard system serves as a &#x201C;thermometer&#x201D;, i.e., as a sensitive probe of the thermal state of the interacting many-body system. We aim at exploring the emergence of thermal properties of the impurity when the entire (subsystem and bath) system is in a given pure and stationary eigenstate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm155"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with energy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm156"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and vanishing state entropy (or von Neumann entropy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm157"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>vN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>). Such an isolated large quantum system can be viewed as the limiting case of the quantum microcanonical ensemble where the width of the energy shell <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm158"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> vanishes, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm159"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Unlike other approaches, it does not invoke any coarse-graining over a macroscopically small but finite width of the energy shell nor any random interactions. For such a quantum system without any a priori built-in statistical randomness, we pose the following question: Starting from a given isolated eigenstate of the entire system, under which conditions will the reduced density matrix of the impurity correspond to a canonical density matrix, i.e., the thermometer will be accurately represented by a Gibbs ensemble or, for short, be in a Gibbs state? If such a thermal state emerges, what will be its temperature <italic>T</italic>, or its inverse temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm160"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>? We refer to this process as emergence of a thermal equilibrium state rather than the frequently used term &#x201C;thermalization&#x201D; as the latter (implicitly) implies a time-dependent approach to an equilibrium state starting from an out-of-equilibrium (statistical or pure) initial state that represents a coherent superposition of different energy eigenstates. We neither invoke any ensemble average over states from the microcanonical energy shell of finite thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm161"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> nor do we invoke wave packet dynamics of a non-stationary state of the entire system.</p>
      <p>For finite isolated systems, in particular, systems with a bounded spectrum such as the present Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard model, the extraction of proper thermodynamic (or thermostatic) variables from the microcanonical ensemble requires special care. As has been recently demonstrated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95-entropy-24-01740">95</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96-entropy-24-01740">96</xref>], the alternative definitions of the entropy used as the fundamental thermodynamic potential for the microcanonical ensemble yield, in general, inequivalent results. The standard definition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97-entropy-24-01740">97</xref>] attributed to Boltzmann
      <disp-formula id="FD18-entropy-24-01740"><label>(18)</label><mml:math id="mm162" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo form="prefix">ln</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo form="prefix">ln</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm163"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> the DOS of the entire closed system, implies an inverse temperature
      <disp-formula id="FD19-entropy-24-01740"><label>(19)</label><mml:math id="mm164" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2202;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2202;</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2202;</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix">ln</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2202;</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2033;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      that may violate certain thermodynamic relations for mesoscopic systems with a bounded spectrum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95-entropy-24-01740">95</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96-entropy-24-01740">96</xref>]. As shown more than 100 years ago [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97-entropy-24-01740">97</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98-entropy-24-01740">98</xref>], the Gibbs entropy defined by
      <disp-formula id="FD20-entropy-24-01740"><label>(20)</label><mml:math id="mm165" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo form="prefix">ln</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      results in an inverse temperature
      <disp-formula id="FD21-entropy-24-01740"><label>(21)</label><mml:math id="mm166" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2202;</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix">ln</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2202;</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      that is free of such inconsistencies. From Equations (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD19-entropy-24-01740">19</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD21-entropy-24-01740">21</xref>), it follows that the two inverse temperature definitions are interrelated through the specific heat <italic>C</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95-entropy-24-01740">95</xref>]
      <disp-formula id="FD22-entropy-24-01740"><label>(22)</label><mml:math id="mm167" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm168"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2202;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2202;</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm169"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Only for systems with a small specific heat of the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm170"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> or smaller, differences between <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm171"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm172"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> become noticeable. This is in particular the case for systems with a bounded spectrum. While <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm173"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> features negative values as soon as the density of states <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm174"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD19-entropy-24-01740">19</xref>)), <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm175"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> remains always positive semi-definite (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD21-entropy-24-01740">21</xref>)). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f006">Figure 6</xref> presents a comparison between <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm176"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm177"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> for the present Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard model with an impurity where we have applied the microcanonical thermodynamic relations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm178"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm179"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (Equations (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD19-entropy-24-01740">19</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD21-entropy-24-01740">21</xref>)) to the numerically determined spectral data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f001">Figure 1</xref>) of the entire system over a wide range of energies <italic>E</italic>. The two inverse temperatures closely follow each other in parallel with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm180"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> shifted upwards relative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm181"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> as long as <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm182"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. For larger <italic>E</italic> when <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm183"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> turns negative, the discrepancies increase as <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm184"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> remains positive for all <italic>E</italic>.</p>
      <p>Alternatively, the entire system can be assigned an inverse temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm185"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> by treating the system as a canonical ensemble. Accordingly, the energy <italic>E</italic> can be expressed in terms of the canonical expectation value
      <disp-formula id="FD23-entropy-24-01740"><label>(23)</label><mml:math id="mm186" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Tr</mml:mi><mml:mfenced separators="" open="[" close="]"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Tr</mml:mi><mml:mfenced separators="" open="[" close="]"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2202;</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix">ln</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2202;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      where <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm187"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>Tr</mml:mi><mml:mfenced separators="" open="[" close="]"><mml:mo form="prefix">exp</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> is the canonical partition function and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm188"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Hamiltonian of the entire system (see Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD1-entropy-24-01740">1</xref>)). For a given <italic>E</italic>, Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD23-entropy-24-01740">23</xref>) yields an implicit relation for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm189"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> also shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f006">Figure 6</xref>. Obviously, for this finite system, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm190"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> is close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm191"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the thermodynamic limit, we would expect <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm192"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. In spite of the fact that the size of our system is still far from the thermodynamic limit <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm193"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x221E;</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, the agreement between different thermodynamic ensembles is already remarkably close. Deviations appear primarily near the tails of the density of states and are larger in the region of negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm194"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> where the DOS decreases rather than increases with <italic>E</italic>.</p>
      <p>The conceptually interesting question now arises which of these temperatures, if any, will be imprinted on the impurity upon an exact calculation of its reduced density matrix by tracing out all bath degrees of freedom from a given single exact eigenstate of a the isolated many-body system, and without invoking any a priori assumption of the microcanonical ensemble.</p>
      <p>To address this question, we start from the density operator for any pure energy eigenstate <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm195"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the entire system given by the projector <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm196"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consequently, the reduced density matrix (RDM) of the impurity follows from tracing out all bath degrees of freedom,
      <disp-formula id="FD24-entropy-24-01740"><label>(24)</label><mml:math id="mm197" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="right"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Tr</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub><mml:mfenced separators="" open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      which will, in general, depend on the parent state <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm198"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> it is derived from. We explore now the generic properties of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm199"><mml:semantics><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> independent of the particular parent state. Specifically, we investigate whether a given <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm200"><mml:semantics><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> emerging from an individual eigenstate <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm201"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> approaches a canonical density matrix. To this end, we diagonalize the RDM
      <disp-formula id="FD25-entropy-24-01740"><label>(25)</label><mml:math id="mm202" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B7;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B7;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      yielding natural orbitals <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm203"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B7;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with natural occupation numbers <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm204"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99-entropy-24-01740">99</xref>]. We emphasize that within the present approach, the RDMs <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm205"><mml:semantics><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and their eigenvalues, the occupation numbers <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm206"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, which characterize the thermal state, are a priori uniquely determined and not influenced by the choice of any (approximate) basis. Compared to previous investigations, this is one distinguishing feature of the present study of the thermal state emerging from an isolated deterministic many-body system. RDMs have been previously employed in studies of disordered fermionic systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100-entropy-24-01740">100</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101-entropy-24-01740">101</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102-entropy-24-01740">102</xref>].</p>
      <p>Canonicity is reached when <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm207"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by the Boltzmann factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm208"><mml:semantics><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>&#x3F5;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm209"><mml:semantics><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>&#x3F5;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> the expectation value of the Hamilton operator <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm210"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the impurity alone evaluated in the basis of natural orbitals, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm211"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>&#x3F5;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B7;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B7;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, which, in turn, should be close to the eigenstates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm212"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover, the resulting value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm213"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> extracted from the fit to the exponential distribution allows the identification of the inverse temperature uniquely characterizing the thermal distribution.</p>
      <p>For a finite-size system with an impurity and a bath with an order of magnitude of 10 particles and finite impurity&#x2013;bath coupling, the residual interaction of the impurity with the bath is not negligible and should therefore be included to improve the numerical accuracy. We account for the residual impurity&#x2013;bath interaction on the level of the mean-field (MF) or Hartree approximation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14-entropy-24-01740">14</xref>]. Accordingly, the energies <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm214"><mml:semantics><mml:msup><mml:mi>&#x3F5;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the impurity appearing in the Boltzmann factor include a correction term
      <disp-formula id="FD26-entropy-24-01740"><label>(26)</label><mml:math id="mm215" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>&#x3F5;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B7;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>MF</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B7;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      where the MF interaction operator in site-representation reads
      <disp-formula id="FD27-entropy-24-01740"><label>(27)</label><mml:math id="mm216" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>MF</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.166667em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C1;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      with
      <disp-formula id="FD28-entropy-24-01740"><label>(28)</label><mml:math id="mm217" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C1;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Tr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced separators="" open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      the reduced one-body density of residual bath particles at the site <italic>j</italic> when the entire system is in state <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm218"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD28-entropy-24-01740">28</xref>), the partial trace over all but one (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm219"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) bath particles and the impurity (I) is denoted by <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm220"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>Tr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The energy fluctuations
      <disp-formula id="FD29-entropy-24-01740"><label>(29)</label><mml:math id="mm221" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>&#x3F5;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">&#x2329;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B7;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>MF</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B7;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>&#x3F5;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      provide a measure for the proximity of the natural orbitals of the RDM to the eigenstates of the (perturbed) single-particle Hamilton operator of the subsystem, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm222"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>eff</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>MF</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The energy fluctuations (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD29-entropy-24-01740">29</xref>)) vanish only when the natural orbitals <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm223"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B7;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with which the matrix elements in Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD29-entropy-24-01740">29</xref>) are evaluated do coincide with the eigenstates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm224"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>eff</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, the variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm225"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>&#x3F5;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> can serve as a distance measure of the natural orbitals from eigenstates of the impurity Hamiltonian operator. The MF correction in Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD27-entropy-24-01740">27</xref>) follows from the Liouville&#x2013;von Neumann equation for the reduced system where the interaction with the bath consists of the MF term and a collision operator. The collision operator describes the correlations between the impurity and the bath particles and contains the so-called two-particle (subsystem&#x2013;bath) cumulant <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm226"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. We numerically monitor the validity of the MF approximation through the magnitude of the two-particle correlation energy determined by <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm227"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consistently, we find that for all many-particle states <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm228"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> which reduce to a near-canonical RDM for the impurity, the correlation energy is negligible compared to the MF energy thereby justifying Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD26-entropy-24-01740">26</xref>). Of course, in the limit of weak impurity&#x2013;bath coupling, the MF correction (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD27-entropy-24-01740">27</xref>)) becomes negligible as well.</p>
      <p>A representative example for the spectrum of the impurity RDM, i.e., the occupation number distribution of natural orbitals of the impurity RDM emerging from a single energy eigenstate of the entire system with state index <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm229"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>4364</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm230"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> sorted by energy) and energy eigenvalue <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm231"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.396</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> lying on the tail of the DOS with positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm232"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm233"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f007">Figure 7</xref>.</p>
      <p>Indeed, a Boltzmann distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm234"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x221D;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>&#x3F5;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> characterizing the canonical density matrix is observed. Moreover, the fit to an exponential yields <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm235"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> in close agreement with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm236"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> predicted by Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD19-entropy-24-01740">19</xref>) for the inverse temperature within the microcanonical ensemble (see also <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f006">Figure 6</xref>) and reproduces the distribution of occupation numbers very well. It also agrees with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm237"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> predicted by Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD23-entropy-24-01740">23</xref>) where the entire system is treated as a canonical ensemble. We note that the Boltzmann-like decay of the diagonal elements would remain qualitatively unchanged when neglecting the MF correction in Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD26-entropy-24-01740">26</xref>) but the fit to <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm238"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> would deteriorate. Thus, from the reduction of state <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm239"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>4364</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, we have verified that a canonical density matrix emerges.</p>
      <p>On a conceptual level, the present results confirm the analysis by Dunkel and Hilbert [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95-entropy-24-01740">95</xref>] who showed that the recently observed experimental single-particle population distribution in an isolated finite cold-atom system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22-entropy-24-01740">22</xref>] is governed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm240"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the canonical density matrix of a small system emerging from tracing out bath variables is characterized by the inverse Boltzmann temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm241"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> rather than by <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm242"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consequently, level inversion in a small system in thermal contact with a bath, in particular, spin systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103-entropy-24-01740">103</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B104-entropy-24-01740">104</xref>], can be properly characterized by negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm243"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The point to be noted is that while <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm244"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> describes the canonical density matrix, the use of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm245"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> is required for consistency in thermodynamic relations such as the Carnot efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95-entropy-24-01740">95</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96-entropy-24-01740">96</xref>]. In the following, we present the numerical results for the canonical density matrix of the impurity in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm246"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> which we denote, from now on, for notational simplicity by <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm247"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. We point out that <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm248"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> can be straightforwardly transformed into <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm249"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> using Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD22-entropy-24-01740">22</xref>) and that none of the conclusions to be drawn in the following are altered by this transformation.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5-entropy-24-01740">
      <title>5. Eigenstate Canonicity and Degree of Quantum Chaoticity</title>
      <p>The demonstration of the emergence of a canonical density matrix from a particular eigenstate <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm250"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm251"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>4364</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the entire system invites now the following questions: Is the reduction to a canonical density matrix generic, i.e., will it emerge for almost all <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm252"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>? Is this appearance related to the quantum chaos present in the underlying many-body system? On a more quantitative footing: For how many of the eigenstates will a canonical density matrix emerge and does this number depend on the degree of quantum chaos of the system?</p>
      <p>We explore these questions by determining the fraction of many-body eigenstates reducing to a canonical density matrix of the impurity, referred to in the following as eigenstate canonicity, as a function of the exact total energy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm253"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> for the complete set of eigenstates <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm254"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the entire system and for varying bath&#x2013;bath interaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm255"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The corresponding degree of quantum chaoticity of the entire system is measured by either the Brody parameter (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD12-entropy-24-01740">12</xref>)) or the Shannon entropy (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD16-entropy-24-01740">16</xref>)). Striking differences in the approach to the thermal state with inverse temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm256"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> appear which are controlled by the Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm257"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (or Shannon entropy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm258"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>): At <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm259"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, when the system is chaotic as indicated by a Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm260"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (or scaled Shannon entropy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm261"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>), a thermal distribution with a well-defined inverse temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm262"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with the (micro)canonical ensemble prediction (Equations (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD19-entropy-24-01740">19</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD23-entropy-24-01740">23</xref>)), emerges for an overwhelming fraction of states with the exception of states in the tails of the spectrum where the DOS is strongly suppressed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f008">Figure 8</xref>a). The large deviations in the tails are consistent with the corresponding deviations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm263"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> in the same spectral region (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f004">Figure 4</xref>a). With decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm264"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and, correspondingly, decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm265"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm266"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, an increasing fraction of states yields values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm267"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> that are far from the thermal ensemble prediction. Moreover, the quality of the fit to a canonical density matrix measured by the variance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm268"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and indicated by the color coding of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f008">Figure 8</xref> drastically deteriorates. In other words, for a significant fraction of states, the emerging RDMs do not conform with the constraints of a canonical density matrix.</p>
      <p>In order to quantify the decomposition of the Hilbert space into the subspace of states <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm269"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> whose reduction to the subsystem yields a canonical density matrix and into the complement whose reduction fails to yield such a thermal state, we introduce a threshold for the variance of the inverse temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm270"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> above which we consider the eigenstate canonicity to be failing. We then calculate for all states <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm271"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> the fraction of emerging canonical density matrices satisfying <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm272"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2264;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Of course, the resulting fraction of states will depend on the precise value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm273"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> chosen. We have determined these fractions for thresholds ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm274"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>th</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xD7;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm275"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xD7;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Changes of the fractions due to variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm276"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> are indicated by the vertical error bars in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f009">Figure 9</xref>. An unambiguous trend of a monotonic increase of the fraction of canonical density matrices with chaoticity is emerging, obviously unaffected by the choice of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm277"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. This fraction representing Gibbs states, denoted in the following by <italic>G</italic>, monotonically increases with quantum chaoticity as parameterized by either the Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm278"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm279"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, or alternatively by the scaled Shannon entropy, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm280"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f009">Figure 9</xref>). Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm281"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm282"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> both increase monotonically with the bath interaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm283"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f005">Figure 5</xref>), this implies also a monotonic relationship <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm284"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The conceptually important observation emerging from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f009">Figure 9</xref> is that the degree of canonicity of the RDM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm285"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, undergoes a continuous transition from the quantum-integrable (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm286"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the quantum-chaotic limit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm287"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>). The strength of level repulsion in the NNLS parameterized by <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm288"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> directly determines the probability of finding the RDM of the impurity represented by a Gibbs ensemble.</p>
      <p>The approach of the RDM of the impurity to the Gibbs ensemble
      <disp-formula id="FD30-entropy-24-01740"><label>(30)</label><mml:math id="mm289" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfrac><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced separators="" open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>MF</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm290"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>Tr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced separators="" open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>MF</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> can be also directly observed in the spatial site representation <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm291"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the RDM of the impurity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f010">Figure 10</xref>b).</p>
      <p>We illustrate the RDM in the site representation for two energetically nearest-neighbor states (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm292"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13,637</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm293"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13,638</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) when the system is in the transition regime between integrable and non-integrable (in the present case, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm294"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>). We quantify the approach to <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm295"><mml:semantics><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> through the density matrix site correlation function
      <disp-formula id="FD31-entropy-24-01740"><label>(31)</label><mml:math id="mm296" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      where <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm297"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> is the RDM of the impurity (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD24-entropy-24-01740">24</xref>)) in the site basis. While the state <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm298"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13,638</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> results in a nearly diagonal RDM in the site basis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f010">Figure 10</xref>a) with rapidly decaying site correlations closely following the prediction for a Gibbs ensemble (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD30-entropy-24-01740">30</xref>)), the adjacent state <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm299"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13,637</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> yields a RDM with significant off-diagonal entries, extended site correlations, and strong deviations from Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD30-entropy-24-01740">30</xref>). Thus, the emergence of a thermal density matrix in the transition regime between quantum integrability and quantum chaos displays strong state-to-state fluctuations and is not a smooth function of the energy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm300"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>As quantitative measure for the distance of a given RDM from the Gibbs ensemble, we use the trace-class norm
      <disp-formula id="FD32-entropy-24-01740"><label>(32)</label><mml:math id="mm301" display="block"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>Gibbs</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
      with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm302"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Tr</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2020;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> the largest of the Schatten p-norms (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm303"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>). For hermitian positive-semidefinite matrices of unit trace, the Schatten 1-norm is bounded by <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm304"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2264;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2264;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. We observe for RDMs derived from all eigenstates of the entire system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f011">Figure 11</xref>) an overall reduction of distances <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm305"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> from a canonical density matrix with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm306"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm307"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f011">Figure 11</xref>a) in the (near) quantum chaotic limit, the vast majority of impurity RDMs have a distance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm308"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2272;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15 from an ideal Gibbs ensemble (apart from those reduced from many-body states in the tail regions of the spectrum with low DOS). The distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm309"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> mirrors the distribution of Shannon entropies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f004">Figure 4</xref>). We note that for the present finite quantum system, we find that the distance measured by the Schatten 1-norm has a lower bound of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm310"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2273;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. As the Schatten 1-norm is sensitive to small deviations in both diagonal and off-diagonal elements, these deviations are due to residual fluctuations (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD29-entropy-24-01740">29</xref>), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f007">Figure 7</xref>) of the natural orbitals of the impurity which are expected to vanish in the thermodynamic limit <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm311"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x221E;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Indeed, plotting the value of the smallest distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm312"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the dimension of the Hilbert space of the system <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm313"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> for three numerically feasible system sizes indicates that the minimal distance vanishes in the thermodynamic limit as <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm314"><mml:semantics><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (inset <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f011">Figure 11</xref>a). With decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm315"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm316"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f011">Figure 11</xref>b, the mean distance of RDMs from a Gibbs state significantly increases and, moreover, the spread becomes much larger reflecting, again, the behavior of the Shannon entropy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f004">Figure 4</xref>c).</p>
      <p>The emergence of canonical density matrices, i.e., of Gibbs states for almost all <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm317"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> in the quantum chaotic limit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm318"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2243;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm319"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>&#x2243;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be viewed as a rather specific manifestation and extension of the ETH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5-entropy-24-01740">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6-entropy-24-01740">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7-entropy-24-01740">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8-entropy-24-01740">8</xref>]. The local observable in this case is the RDM of the impurity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm320"><mml:semantics><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, itself. Its diagonal elements are, indeed, a smooth function of the total energy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm321"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> as predicted by ETH but now, more specifically, Boltzmann-distributed <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm322"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x221D;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>&#x3F5;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> over impurity states with the inverse temperature imprinted by <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm323"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The present analysis covers, in addition, also the transition regime between quantum integrability and quantum chaos (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm324"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) where, in general, the ETH does not apply. A canonical density matrix may still emerge but now only for a decreasing fraction of eigenstates of the finite large system. The size of this fraction <italic>G</italic> is predicted by the degree of quantum chaoticity as measured by the Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm325"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> or Shannon entropy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm326"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f009">Figure 9</xref>).</p>
      <p>The direct relation between the emergence of the canonical density matrix for a small subsystem from eigenstate reduction and the quantum chaoticity of the large system it is embedded in, established here for a finite quantum system, raises the conceptual question as to the extension of this connection to the thermodynamic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm327"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x221E;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) limit. Clearly, this question cannot be conclusively addressed by the present method of exact diagonalization. Nevertheless, we can provide evidence to this effect by exploring the scaling with system size still within computational reach. We first establish that the degree of quantum chaoticity as measured by the Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm328"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (or the Shannon entropy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm329"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) indeed increases with system size at fixed strength of the interaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm330"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> that breaks quantum integrability (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f012">Figure 12</xref>).</p>
      <p>We vary the system size by increasing the total number of sites while keeping the system at (approximate) half-filling of bath particles. The corresponding Hilbert space increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm331"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>22,308</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm332"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm333"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm334"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>96,525</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm335"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm336"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>). The observed increase of quantum chaoticity with system size is qualitatively in line with properties of classical chaos: In a mixed phase space with surviving local regular structures such as tori, their influence on phase space dynamics is rapidly diminishing with increasing phase space dimension a prominent example of which is Arnold diffusion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3-entropy-24-01740">3</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4-entropy-24-01740">4</xref>]. This increase of quantum chaoticity with system size at fixed interaction strength turns out to be key for the emergence of a universal, i.e., (nearly) system-size-independent, interrelation between the fraction of canonical eigenstates and the degree of quantum chaoticity. Both the Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm337"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as the fraction of density matrices complying with the Gibbs ensemble increase with system size at fixed bath interaction strength. As a consequence, a near universal, i.e., size-independent, relation <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm338"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> between the fraction of (approximate) Gibbs states and the degree of quantum chaos as measured by <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm339"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> emerges (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f013">Figure 13</xref>).</p>
      <p>The data for different combinations of values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm340"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm341"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> fall on the same curve. A very similar relation would emerge for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm342"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the scaled Shannon entropy. We have thus established the remarkable feature that the fraction of canonical eigenstates, i.e., the likelihood that a subsystem is in a Gibbs state when the large but finite system is in a pure energy eigenstate with zero von Neumann entropy is controlled and can be tuned by <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm343"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (or <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm344"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) and, in turn, by the degree of level repulsion in the quantum many-body system which is controlled by <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm345"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec6-entropy-24-01740">
      <title>6. Conclusions and Outlook</title>
      <p>In this work, we have explored the emergence of a thermal state (or Gibbs ensemble) of a small (sub)system in contact with a bath when the combined large but finite deterministic quantum system is isolated and in a well-defined energy eigenstate. As prototypical case, we have considered an impurity embedded in an interacting spin-polarized Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard many-body bath which facilitates a clear-cut subsystem&#x2013;bath decomposition and a tunable transition of the entire system from quantum integrability to quantum chaos. By tracing out the bath degrees of freedom, we have investigated how many of the resulting reduced density matrices of the subsystem represent a canonical density matrix. We have shown that the probability for finding a canonical density matrix monotonically increases with the degree of quantum chaos. The degree of quantum chaos is identified here by both the energy-level statistics as well as by the randomness of the eigenstates as measured by the Shannon entropy. The likelihood for the emergence of thermal states is thus found to be controlled by the degree of quantum chaoticity as parameterized by the Brody parameter or the Shannon entropy. Even though our simulations are limited to finite-size systems, the present results for varying system sizes suggest that the relation between the fraction of eigenstates of the isolated many-body system whose reduction to a small subsystem yields a reduced canonical density matrix and the degree of quantum chaoticity is universal, i.e., size-independent.</p>
      <p>Each many-body eigenstate represents the fine-grained version of the energy shell of the microcanonical ensemble of the entire impurity&#x2013;bath system. This connection between the fraction of canonical eigenstates and quantum chaoticity thus offers a direct quantum analogue to the role of classical chaos which Boltzmann invoked in deducing the classical (micro-)canonical ensemble. One can view this as an example of classical&#x2013;quantum correspondence to this cornerstone of the foundation of statistical mechanics. The statistical ensemble properties can already emerge for isolated energy eigenstates without invoking any randomness, e.g., coarse-graining over a macroscopically thin energy shell or superposition of many eigenstates of the isolated large system as frequently employed. The emergence of statistical ensemble properties from the reduction of pure states was already early anticipated by Landau and Lifshitz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42-entropy-24-01740">42</xref>] and later related to quantum chaos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14-entropy-24-01740">14</xref>]. The present study establishes a direct quantitative relationship between the degree of canonicity and the degree of quantum chaos, in particular, also covering the transition regime from quantum integrability to quantum chaos.</p>
      <p>The present results are also expected to have implications for the topical issue of thermalization in finite quantum systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24-entropy-24-01740">24</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26-entropy-24-01740">26</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27-entropy-24-01740">27</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30-entropy-24-01740">30</xref>]. In this paper, we intentionally avoided this notion and, instead, focused on thermal equilibrium states as we deduce the canonical density matrix from stationary energy eigenstates bypassing any explicit time dependence of the dynamics. Thermalization of an initial non-equilibrium state is, by contrast, a fundamental probe of the time evolution of quantum many-body systems. Up to now, one primary focus has been on quantum quenches, the relaxation of out-off equilibrium initial states. Their time evolution has typically shown a transition from an exponential decay for weakly perturbed many-body systems to a Gaussian decay in the strongly coupled limit, however, without an unambiguous correlation to quantum chaos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B105-entropy-24-01740">105</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B106-entropy-24-01740">106</xref>]. The Shannon entropy was found to linearly increase with time before reaching saturation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107-entropy-24-01740">107</xref>]. For disordered systems, an initial rapid decay followed by a slow power-law relaxation of occupation numbers has been observed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66-entropy-24-01740">66</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102-entropy-24-01740">102</xref>]. The extension of the present study to a non-equilibrium initial state of a deterministic many-body system would yield the time evolution of the entire one-body RDM, and its eigenvalues and eigenvectors, the time dependence of which remains to be explored. Moreover, the dependence of the relaxation dynamics of the RDM on the choice of the initial state for systems in the transition regime between quantum integrability and quantum chaos (i.e., for intermediate values of the Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm346"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) is of particular interest. Most importantly, will quantum chaos play an analogous role for the process of mixing as classical chaos does for classical non-equilibrium dynamics and the relaxation to equilibrium? The origin and properties of such &#x201C;quantum mixing&#x201D; remain a widely open question.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <notes>
      <title>Author Contributions</title>
      <p>Data curation, M.K. and I.B.; Formal analysis, J.B. and I.B.; Funding acquisition, J.B. and I.B.; Investigation, M.K., J.B. and I.B.; Methodology, I.B.; Software, M.K., S.D., F.L. and I.B.; Supervision, I.B.; Validation, I.B.; Visualization, I.B.; Writing&#x2014;original draft, I.B.; Writing&#x2014;review and editing, S.D., F.L., J.B. and I.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p>
    </notes>
    <notes>
      <title>Institutional Review Board Statement</title>
      <p>Not applicable.</p>
    </notes>
    <notes>
      <title>Informed Consent Statement</title>
      <p>Not applicable.</p>
    </notes>
    <notes>
      <title>Data Availability Statement</title>
      <p>The presented data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.</p>
    </notes>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>We thank Sebastian Bichelmaier for helpful discussions.</p>
    </ack>
    <notes notes-type="COI-statement">
      <title>Conflicts of Interest</title>
      <p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>
    </notes>
    <glossary>
      <title>Abbreviations</title>
      <p>The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
      <array><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="middle">DOS</td><td align="left" valign="middle">Density of states</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle">ETH</td><td align="left" valign="middle">Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle">GOE</td><td align="left" valign="middle">Gaussian orthogonal ensemble</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle">MF</td><td align="left" valign="middle">Mean field</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle">NNLS</td><td align="left" valign="middle">Nearest-neighbor level spacing</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle">RDM</td><td align="left" valign="middle">Reduced density matrix</td></tr></tbody></array></p>
    </glossary>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>1.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Boltzmann</surname>
              <given-names>L.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>Vorlesungen &#xFC;ber Gastheorie</source>
          <publisher-name>Verlag Johann Ambrosius Barth</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Leipzig, Germany</publisher-loc>
          <year>1896</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>2.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Huang</surname>
              <given-names>K.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>Statistical Mechanics</source>
          <publisher-name>Wiley</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>New York, NY, USA</publisher-loc>
          <year>1988</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>3.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Arnold</surname>
              <given-names>V.I.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics</source>
          <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>New York, NY, USA</publisher-loc>
          <year>1979</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>4.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Lichtenberg</surname>
              <given-names>A.J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lieberman</surname>
              <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>Regular and Chaotic Dynamics</source>
          <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>New York, NY, USA</publisher-loc>
          <year>1991</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>5.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Deutsch</surname>
              <given-names>J.M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. A</source>
          <year>1991</year>
          <volume>43</volume>
          <fpage>2046</fpage>
          <lpage>2049</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevA.43.2046</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>6.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Srednicki</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Chaos and quantum thermalization</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>1994</year>
          <volume>50</volume>
          <fpage>888</fpage>
          <lpage>901</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.50.888</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9962049</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>7.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Srednicki</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Thermal fluctuations in quantized chaotic systems</article-title>
          <source>J. Phys. A Math. Gen.</source>
          <year>1996</year>
          <volume>29</volume>
          <fpage>L75</fpage>
          <lpage>L79</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0305-4470/29/4/003</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>8.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Srednicki</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems</article-title>
          <source>J. Phys. A Math. Gen.</source>
          <year>1999</year>
          <volume>32</volume>
          <fpage>1163</fpage>
          <lpage>1175</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0305-4470/32/7/007</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>9.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Zelevinsky</surname>
              <given-names>V.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Brown</surname>
              <given-names>B.A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Frazier</surname>
              <given-names>N.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Horoi</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The nuclear shell model as a testing ground for many-body quantum chaos</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rep.</source>
          <year>1996</year>
          <volume>276</volume>
          <fpage>85</fpage>
          <lpage>176</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0370-1573(96)00007-5</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>10.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Flambaum</surname>
              <given-names>V.V.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Izrailev</surname>
              <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Casati</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Towards a statistical theory of finite Fermi systems and compound states: Random two-body interaction approach</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>1996</year>
          <volume>54</volume>
          <fpage>2136</fpage>
          <lpage>2139</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.54.2136</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>11.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Flambaum</surname>
              <given-names>V.V.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Izrailev</surname>
              <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Statistical theory of finite Fermi systems based on the structure of chaotic eigenstates</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>1997</year>
          <volume>56</volume>
          <fpage>5144</fpage>
          <lpage>5159</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.56.5144</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>12.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Borgonovi</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Guarneri</surname>
              <given-names>I.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Izrailev</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Casati</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Chaos and thermalization in a dynamical model of two interacting particles</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Lett. A</source>
          <year>1998</year>
          <volume>247</volume>
          <fpage>140</fpage>
          <lpage>144</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00545-3</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>13.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Borgonovi</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Celardo</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Izrailev</surname>
              <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Casati</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Semiquantal Approach to Finite Systems of Interacting Particles</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2002</year>
          <volume>88</volume>
          <fpage>054101</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.054101</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>14.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Borgonovi</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Izrailev</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Santos</surname>
              <given-names>L.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Zelevinsky</surname>
              <given-names>V.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Quantum chaos and thermalization in isolated systems of interacting particles</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rep.</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          <volume>626</volume>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>58</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.physrep.2016.02.005</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>15.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>M&#xFC;ller</surname>
              <given-names>M.P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Adlam</surname>
              <given-names>E.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Masanes</surname>
              <given-names>L.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Wiebe</surname>
              <given-names>N.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Thermalization and Canonical Typicality in Translation-Invariant Quantum Lattice Systems</article-title>
          <source>Commun. Math. Phys.</source>
          <year>2015</year>
          <volume>340</volume>
          <fpage>499</fpage>
          <lpage>561</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00220-015-2473-y</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>16.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Reimann</surname>
              <given-names>P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gemmer</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Why are macroscopic experiments reproducible? Imitating the behavior of an ensemble by single pure states</article-title>
          <source>Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl.</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          <volume>552</volume>
          <fpage>121840</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.physa.2019.121840</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>17.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Brenes</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pappalardi</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Goold</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Silva</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Multipartite Entanglement Structure in the Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          <volume>124</volume>
          <fpage>040605</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.040605</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32058780</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>18.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Brenes</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pappalardi</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mitchison</surname>
              <given-names>M.T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Goold</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Silva</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Out-of-time-order correlations and the fine structure of eigenstate thermalization</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>2021</year>
          <volume>104</volume>
          <fpage>034120</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.104.034120</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34654075</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>19.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Sugimoto</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hamazaki</surname>
              <given-names>R.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ueda</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Eigenstate Thermalization in Long-Range Interacting Systems</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2022</year>
          <volume>129</volume>
          <fpage>030602</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.030602</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>20.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Wang</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Benenti</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Casati</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Wang</surname>
              <given-names>W.G.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Complexity of quantum motion and quantum-classical correspondence: A phase-space approach</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Res.</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          <volume>2</volume>
          <fpage>043178</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043178</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>21.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Wang</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Benenti</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Casati</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Wang</surname>
              <given-names>W.g.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Quantum chaos and the correspondence principle</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>2021</year>
          <volume>103</volume>
          <fpage>L030201</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.103.L030201</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>22.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Braun</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ronzheimer</surname>
              <given-names>J.P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schreiber</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hodgman</surname>
              <given-names>S.S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rom</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bloch</surname>
              <given-names>I.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schneider</surname>
              <given-names>U.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Negative Absolute Temperature for Motional Degrees of Freedom</article-title>
          <source>Science</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          <volume>339</volume>
          <fpage>52</fpage>
          <lpage>55</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1227831</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>23.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Kaufman</surname>
              <given-names>A.M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Tai</surname>
              <given-names>M.E.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lukin</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rispoli</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schittko</surname>
              <given-names>R.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Preiss</surname>
              <given-names>P.M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Greiner</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Quantum thermalization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system</article-title>
          <source>Science</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          <volume>353</volume>
          <fpage>794</fpage>
          <lpage>800</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aaf6725</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>24.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Jansen</surname>
              <given-names>D.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Stolpp</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Vidmar</surname>
              <given-names>L.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Heidrich-Meisner</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Eigenstate thermalization and quantum chaos in the Holstein polaron model</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. B</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          <volume>99</volume>
          <fpage>155130</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.99.155130</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>25.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Abanin</surname>
              <given-names>D.A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Altman</surname>
              <given-names>E.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bloch</surname>
              <given-names>I.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Serbyn</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title><italic>Colloquium</italic>: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement</article-title>
          <source>Rev. Mod. Phys.</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          <volume>91</volume>
          <fpage>021001</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/RevModPhys.91.021001</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>26.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Pr&#xFC;fer</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kunkel</surname>
              <given-names>P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Strobel</surname>
              <given-names>H.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lannig</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Linnemann</surname>
              <given-names>D.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schmied</surname>
              <given-names>C.M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Berges</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gasenzer</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Oberthaler</surname>
              <given-names>M.K.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Observation of universal dynamics in a spinor Bose gas far from equilibrium</article-title>
          <source>Nature</source>
          <year>2018</year>
          <volume>563</volume>
          <fpage>217</fpage>
          <lpage>220</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-018-0659-0</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30405226</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>27.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Erne</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>B&#xFC;cker</surname>
              <given-names>R.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gasenzer</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Berges</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schmiedmayer</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Universal dynamics in an isolated one-dimensional Bose gas far from equilibrium</article-title>
          <source>Nature</source>
          <year>2018</year>
          <volume>563</volume>
          <fpage>225</fpage>
          <lpage>229</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-018-0667-0</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30405227</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>28.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Scherg</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kohlert</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Sala</surname>
              <given-names>P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pollmann</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hebbe Madhusudhana</surname>
              <given-names>B.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bloch</surname>
              <given-names>I.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Aidelsburger</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Observing non-ergodicity due to kinetic constraints in tilted Fermi-Hubbard chains</article-title>
          <source>Nat. Commun.</source>
          <year>2021</year>
          <volume>12</volume>
          <fpage>4490</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-021-24726-0</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>29.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Neyenhuis</surname>
              <given-names>B.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Zhang</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hess</surname>
              <given-names>P.W.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Smith</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lee</surname>
              <given-names>A.C.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Richerme</surname>
              <given-names>P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gong</surname>
              <given-names>Z.X.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gorshkov</surname>
              <given-names>A.V.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Monroe</surname>
              <given-names>C.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Observation of prethermalization in long-range interacting spin chains</article-title>
          <source>Sci. Adv.</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          <volume>3</volume>
          <fpage>e1700672</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/sciadv.1700672</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>30.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Neill</surname>
              <given-names>C.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Roushan</surname>
              <given-names>P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Fang</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chen</surname>
              <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kolodrubetz</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chen</surname>
              <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Megrant</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Barends</surname>
              <given-names>R.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Campbell</surname>
              <given-names>B.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chiaro</surname>
              <given-names>B.</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Ergodic dynamics and thermalization in an isolated quantum system</article-title>
          <source>Nat. Phys.</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          <volume>12</volume>
          <fpage>1037</fpage>
          <lpage>1041</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nphys3830</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>31.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Trotzky</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chen</surname>
              <given-names>Y.A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Flesch</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>McCulloch</surname>
              <given-names>I.P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schollw&#xF6;ck</surname>
              <given-names>U.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Eisert</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bloch</surname>
              <given-names>I.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Probing the relaxation towards equilibrium in an isolated strongly correlated one-dimensional Bose gas</article-title>
          <source>Nat. Phys.</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          <volume>8</volume>
          <fpage>325</fpage>
          <lpage>330</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nphys2232</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>32.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Neumann</surname>
              <given-names>J.V.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Beweis des Ergodensatzes und desH-Theorems in der neuen Mechanik</article-title>
          <source>Z. Phys.</source>
          <year>1929</year>
          <volume>57</volume>
          <fpage>30</fpage>
          <lpage>70</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF01339852</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>33.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Goldstein</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lebowitz</surname>
              <given-names>J.L.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Tumulka</surname>
              <given-names>R.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Zangh&#xEC;</surname>
              <given-names>N.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Long-time behavior of macroscopic quantum systems: Commentary accompanying the English translation of John von Neumann&#x2019;s 1929 article on the quantum ergodic theorem</article-title>
          <source>Eur. Phys. J. H</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          <volume>35</volume>
          <fpage>173</fpage>
          <lpage>200</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epjh/e2010-00007-7</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>34.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>D&#x2019;Alessio</surname>
              <given-names>L.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kafri</surname>
              <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Polkovnikov</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rigol</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics</article-title>
          <source>Adv. Phys.</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          <volume>65</volume>
          <fpage>239</fpage>
          <lpage>362</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00018732.2016.1198134</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>35.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Siskens</surname>
              <given-names>T.J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bongaarts</surname>
              <given-names>P.J.M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Ergodicity of operators in finite quantum systems</article-title>
          <source>Physica</source>
          <year>1973</year>
          <volume>68</volume>
          <fpage>315</fpage>
          <lpage>341</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0031-8914(73)90103-1</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>36.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Bongaarts</surname>
              <given-names>P.J.M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Siskens</surname>
              <given-names>T.J.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Observables, constants of the motion and ergodicity in quantum-statistical mechanics of finite systems</article-title>
          <source>Physica</source>
          <year>1974</year>
          <volume>71</volume>
          <fpage>529</fpage>
          <lpage>559</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0031-8914(74)90019-6</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>37.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Mori</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ikeda</surname>
              <given-names>T.N.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kaminishi</surname>
              <given-names>E.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ueda</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Thermalization and prethermalization in isolated quantum systems: A theoretical overview</article-title>
          <source>J. Phys. At. Mol. Opt. Phys.</source>
          <year>2018</year>
          <volume>51</volume>
          <fpage>112001</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1361-6455/aabcdf</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>38.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Popescu</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Short</surname>
              <given-names>A.J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Winter</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics</article-title>
          <source>Nat. Phys.</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          <volume>2</volume>
          <fpage>754</fpage>
          <lpage>758</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nphys444</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>39.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Goldstein</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lebowitz</surname>
              <given-names>J.L.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Tumulka</surname>
              <given-names>R.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Zangh&#xEC;</surname>
              <given-names>N.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Canonical Typicality</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          <volume>96</volume>
          <fpage>050403</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.050403</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16486907</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>40.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Reimann</surname>
              <given-names>P.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Typicality for Generalized Microcanonical Ensembles</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2007</year>
          <volume>99</volume>
          <fpage>160404</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.160404</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>41.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Schr&#xF6;dinger</surname>
              <given-names>E.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>Statistical Thermodynamics</source>
          <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Cambridge, UK</publisher-loc>
          <year>1952</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>42.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Landau</surname>
              <given-names>L.D.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lifshitz</surname>
              <given-names>E.M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>Statistical Physics</source>
          <publisher-name>Pergamon Press</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Oxford, UK</publisher-loc>
          <year>1958</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>43.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Bohigas</surname>
              <given-names>O.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Giannoni</surname>
              <given-names>M.J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schmit</surname>
              <given-names>C.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Characterization of Chaotic Quantum Spectra and Universality of Level Fluctuation Laws</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>1984</year>
          <volume>52</volume>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>4</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>44.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Casati</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chirikov</surname>
              <given-names>B.V.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Izraelev</surname>
              <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ford</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Stochastic behavior of a quantum pendulum under a periodic perturbation</article-title>
          <source>Stochastic Behavior in Classical and Quantum Hamiltonian Systems</source>
          <comment>Series Title: Lecture Notes in Physics</comment>
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <name>
              <surname>Casati</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ford</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany</publisher-loc>
          <year>1979</year>
          <volume>Volume 93</volume>
          <fpage>334</fpage>
          <lpage>352</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BFb0021757</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>45.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Casati</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Relevance of classical chaos in quantum mechanics: The hydrogen atom in a monochromatic field</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rep.</source>
          <year>1987</year>
          <volume>154</volume>
          <fpage>77</fpage>
          <lpage>123</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0370-1573(87)90009-3</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>46.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Haake</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>Quantum Signatures of Chaos</source>
          <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany</publisher-loc>
          <year>2001</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>47.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Gutzwiller</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics</source>
          <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>New York, NY, USA</publisher-loc>
          <year>1990</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>48.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Berry</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Quantum chaology, not quantum chaos</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Scr.</source>
          <year>1989</year>
          <volume>40</volume>
          <fpage>335</fpage>
          <lpage>336</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0031-8949/40/3/013</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>49.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Prosen</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Robnik</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Energy level statistics in the transition region between integrability and chaos</article-title>
          <source>J. Phys. A Math. Gen.</source>
          <year>1993</year>
          <volume>26</volume>
          <fpage>2371</fpage>
          <lpage>2387</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0305-4470/26/10/010</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>50.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Berry</surname>
              <given-names>M.V.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Tabor</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Level Clustering in the Regular Spectrum</article-title>
          <source>Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.</source>
          <year>1977</year>
          <volume>356</volume>
          <fpage>375</fpage>
          <lpage>394</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspa.1977.0140</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>51.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Mehta</surname>
              <given-names>M.L.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>Random Matrices</source>
          <publisher-name>Elsevier Academic Press</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Amsterdam, The Netherlands</publisher-loc>
          <year>2004</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>52.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Shapiro</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Goelman</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Onset of Chaos in an Isolated Energy Eigenstate</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>1984</year>
          <volume>53</volume>
          <fpage>1714</fpage>
          <lpage>1717</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1714</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>53.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Rigol</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Dunjko</surname>
              <given-names>V.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Olshanii</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems</article-title>
          <source>Nature</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          <volume>452</volume>
          <fpage>854</fpage>
          <lpage>858</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature06838</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18421349</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>54.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Rigol</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Breakdown of Thermalization in Finite One-Dimensional Systems</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2009</year>
          <volume>103</volume>
          <fpage>100403</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.100403</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>55.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Rigol</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Quantum quenches and thermalization in one-dimensional fermionic systems</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. A</source>
          <year>2009</year>
          <volume>80</volume>
          <fpage>053607</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevA.80.053607</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>56.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Rigol</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Srednicki</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Alternatives to Eigenstate Thermalization</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          <volume>108</volume>
          <fpage>110601</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.110601</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>57.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Santos</surname>
              <given-names>L.F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rigol</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Localization and the effects of symmetries in the thermalization properties of one-dimensional quantum systems</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          <volume>82</volume>
          <fpage>031130</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.82.031130</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B58-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>58.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Santos</surname>
              <given-names>L.F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rigol</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Onset of quantum chaos in one-dimensional bosonic and fermionic systems and its relation to thermalization</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          <volume>81</volume>
          <fpage>036206</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.81.036206</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B59-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>59.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Genway</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ho</surname>
              <given-names>A.F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lee</surname>
              <given-names>D.K.K.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Dynamics of Thermalization in Small Hubbard-Model Systems</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          <volume>105</volume>
          <fpage>260402</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.260402</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B60-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>60.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Genway</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ho</surname>
              <given-names>A.F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lee</surname>
              <given-names>D.K.K.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Thermalization of local observables in small Hubbard lattices</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. A</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          <volume>86</volume>
          <fpage>023609</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevA.86.023609</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B61-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>61.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>H.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ikeda</surname>
              <given-names>T.N.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Huse</surname>
              <given-names>D.A.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Testing whether all eigenstates obey the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>2014</year>
          <volume>90</volume>
          <fpage>052105</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.90.052105</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B62-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>62.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Garrison</surname>
              <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Grover</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Does a Single Eigenstate Encode the Full Hamiltonian?</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. X</source>
          <year>2018</year>
          <volume>8</volume>
          <fpage>021026</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021026</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B63-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>63.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Schlagheck</surname>
              <given-names>P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Shepelyansky</surname>
              <given-names>D.L.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Dynamical thermalization in Bose-Hubbard systems</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          <volume>93</volume>
          <fpage>012126</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.93.012126</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B64-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>64.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Brenes</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>LeBlond</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Goold</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rigol</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Eigenstate Thermalization in a Locally Perturbed Integrable System</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          <volume>125</volume>
          <fpage>070605</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.070605</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B65-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>65.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Santos</surname>
              <given-names>L.F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Polkovnikov</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rigol</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Weak and strong typicality in quantum systems</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          <volume>86</volume>
          <fpage>010102</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.86.010102</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23005351</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B66-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>66.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Krause</surname>
              <given-names>U.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pellegrin</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Brouwer</surname>
              <given-names>P.W.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Abanin</surname>
              <given-names>D.A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Filippone</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Nucleation of Ergodicity by a Single Mobile Impurity in Supercooled Insulators</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2021</year>
          <volume>126</volume>
          <fpage>030603</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.030603</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B67-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>67.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Gaunt</surname>
              <given-names>A.L.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schmidutz</surname>
              <given-names>T.F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gotlibovych</surname>
              <given-names>I.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Smith</surname>
              <given-names>R.P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hadzibabic</surname>
              <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Bose-Einstein Condensation of Atoms in a Uniform Potential</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          <volume>110</volume>
          <fpage>200406</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.200406</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25167389</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B68-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>68.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Fukuhara</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kantian</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Endres</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Cheneau</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schau&#xDF;</surname>
              <given-names>P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hild</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bellem</surname>
              <given-names>D.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schollw&#xF6;ck</surname>
              <given-names>U.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Giamarchi</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gross</surname>
              <given-names>C.</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Quantum dynamics of a mobile spin impurity</article-title>
          <source>Nat. Phys.</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          <volume>9</volume>
          <fpage>235</fpage>
          <lpage>241</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nphys2561</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B69-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>69.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Haller</surname>
              <given-names>E.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hudson</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kelly</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Cotta</surname>
              <given-names>D.A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Peaudecerf</surname>
              <given-names>B.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bruce</surname>
              <given-names>G.D.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kuhr</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Single-atom imaging of fermions in a quantum-gas microscope</article-title>
          <source>Nat. Phys.</source>
          <year>2015</year>
          <volume>11</volume>
          <fpage>738</fpage>
          <lpage>742</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nphys3403</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B70-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>70.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Parsons</surname>
              <given-names>M.F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Huber</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mazurenko</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chiu</surname>
              <given-names>C.S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Setiawan</surname>
              <given-names>W.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Wooley-Brown</surname>
              <given-names>K.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Blatt</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Greiner</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Site-Resolved Imaging of Fermionic Li 6 in an Optical Lattice</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2015</year>
          <volume>114</volume>
          <fpage>213002</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.213002</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B71-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>71.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Cheuk</surname>
              <given-names>L.W.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Nichols</surname>
              <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Okan</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gersdorf</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ramasesh</surname>
              <given-names>V.V.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bakr</surname>
              <given-names>W.S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lompe</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Zwierlein</surname>
              <given-names>M.W.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Quantum-Gas Microscope for Fermionic Atoms</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2015</year>
          <volume>114</volume>
          <fpage>193001</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.193001</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26024169</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B72-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>72.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Greif</surname>
              <given-names>D.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Parsons</surname>
              <given-names>M.F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mazurenko</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chiu</surname>
              <given-names>C.S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Blatt</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Huber</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ji</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Greiner</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Site-resolved imaging of a fermionic Mott insulator</article-title>
          <source>Science</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          <volume>351</volume>
          <fpage>953</fpage>
          <lpage>957</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aad9041</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26917766</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B73-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>73.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Schreiber</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hodgman</surname>
              <given-names>S.S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bordia</surname>
              <given-names>P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>L&#xFC;schen</surname>
              <given-names>H.P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Fischer</surname>
              <given-names>M.H.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Vosk</surname>
              <given-names>R.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Altman</surname>
              <given-names>E.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schneider</surname>
              <given-names>U.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bloch</surname>
              <given-names>I.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice</article-title>
          <source>Science</source>
          <year>2015</year>
          <volume>349</volume>
          <fpage>842</fpage>
          <lpage>845</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aaa7432</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26229112</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B74-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>74.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Boll</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hilker</surname>
              <given-names>T.A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Salomon</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Omran</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Nespolo</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pollet</surname>
              <given-names>L.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bloch</surname>
              <given-names>I.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gross</surname>
              <given-names>C.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Spin- and density-resolved microscopy of antiferromagnetic correlations in Fermi-Hubbard chains</article-title>
          <source>Science</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          <volume>353</volume>
          <fpage>1257</fpage>
          <lpage>1260</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aag1635</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B75-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>75.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Berry</surname>
              <given-names>M.V.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Regular and irregular semiclassical wavefunctions</article-title>
          <source>J. Phys. A Math. Gen.</source>
          <year>1977</year>
          <volume>10</volume>
          <fpage>2083</fpage>
          <lpage>2091</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0305-4470/10/12/016</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B76-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>76.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Pandey</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Claeys</surname>
              <given-names>P.W.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Campbell</surname>
              <given-names>D.K.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Polkovnikov</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Sels</surname>
              <given-names>D.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Adiabatic Eigenstate Deformations as a Sensitive Probe for Quantum Chaos</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. X</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          <volume>10</volume>
          <fpage>041017</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041017</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B77-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>77.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Wang</surname>
              <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Robnik</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Statistical properties of the localization measure of chaotic eigenstates in the Dicke model</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          <volume>102</volume>
          <fpage>032212</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.102.032212</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B78-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>78.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Lozej</surname>
              <given-names>C.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Casati</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Prosen</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Quantum chaos in triangular billiards</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Res.</source>
          <year>2022</year>
          <volume>4</volume>
          <fpage>013138</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013138</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B79-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>79.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Li</surname>
              <given-names>B.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Robnik</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Statistical properties of high-lying chaotic eigenstates</article-title>
          <source>J. Phys. A Math. Gen.</source>
          <year>1994</year>
          <volume>27</volume>
          <fpage>5509</fpage>
          <lpage>5523</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0305-4470/27/16/017</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B80-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>80.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Gurevich</surname>
              <given-names>I.I.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pevzner</surname>
              <given-names>M.I.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>&#x201C;Repulsion&#x201D; of Nuclear Levels</article-title>
          <source>J. Exp. Theor. Phys.</source>
          <year>1957</year>
          <volume>4</volume>
          <fpage>278</fpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B81-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>81.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Oganesyan</surname>
              <given-names>V.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Huse</surname>
              <given-names>D.A.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. B</source>
          <year>2007</year>
          <volume>75</volume>
          <fpage>155111</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.75.155111</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B82-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>82.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Atas</surname>
              <given-names>Y.Y.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bogomolny</surname>
              <given-names>E.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Giraud</surname>
              <given-names>O.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Roux</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Distribution of the Ratio of Consecutive Level Spacings in Random Matrix Ensembles</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          <volume>110</volume>
          <fpage>084101</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.084101</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23473149</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B83-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>83.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Berry</surname>
              <given-names>M.V.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Robnik</surname>
              <given-names>M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Semiclassical level spacings when regular and chaotic orbits coexist</article-title>
          <source>J. Phys. A Math. Gen.</source>
          <year>1984</year>
          <volume>17</volume>
          <fpage>2413</fpage>
          <lpage>2421</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0305-4470/17/12/013</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B84-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>84.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Hasegawa</surname>
              <given-names>H.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mikeska</surname>
              <given-names>H.J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Frahm</surname>
              <given-names>H.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Stochastic formulation of energy-level statistics</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. A</source>
          <year>1988</year>
          <volume>38</volume>
          <fpage>395</fpage>
          <lpage>399</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevA.38.395</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B85-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>85.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Caurier</surname>
              <given-names>E.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Grammaticos</surname>
              <given-names>B.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ramani</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Level repulsion near integrability: A random matrix analogy</article-title>
          <source>J. Phys. A Math. Gen.</source>
          <year>1990</year>
          <volume>23</volume>
          <fpage>4903</fpage>
          <lpage>4909</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0305-4470/23/21/029</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B86-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>86.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Lenz</surname>
              <given-names>G.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Haake</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Reliability of small matrices for large spectra with nonuniversal fluctuations</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>1991</year>
          <volume>67</volume>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>4</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B87-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>87.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Izrailev</surname>
              <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Quantum localization and statistics of quasienergy spectrum in a classically chaotic system</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Lett. A</source>
          <year>1988</year>
          <volume>134</volume>
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          <lpage>18</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0375-9601(88)90538-5</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B88-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>88.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Brody</surname>
              <given-names>T.A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Flores</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>French</surname>
              <given-names>J.B.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mello</surname>
              <given-names>P.A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pandey</surname>
              <given-names>A.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Wong</surname>
              <given-names>S.S.M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Random-matrix physics: Spectrum and strength fluctuations</article-title>
          <source>Rev. Mod. Phys.</source>
          <year>1981</year>
          <volume>53</volume>
          <fpage>385</fpage>
          <lpage>479</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/RevModPhys.53.385</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B89-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>89.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Yang</surname>
              <given-names>X.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Burgd&#xF6;rfer</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Molecular-dynamics approach to the statistical properties of energy levels</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>1991</year>
          <volume>66</volume>
          <fpage>982</fpage>
          <lpage>985</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.982</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B90-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>90.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Libisch</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Stampfer</surname>
              <given-names>C.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Burgd&#xF6;rfer</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Graphene quantum dots: Beyond a Dirac billiard</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. B</source>
          <year>2009</year>
          <volume>79</volume>
          <fpage>115423</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115423</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B91-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>91.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Izrailev</surname>
              <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Simple models of quantum chaos: Spectrum and eigenfunctions</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rep.</source>
          <year>1990</year>
          <volume>196</volume>
          <fpage>299</fpage>
          <lpage>392</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0370-1573(90)90067-C</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B92-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>92.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>McDonald</surname>
              <given-names>S.W.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kaufman</surname>
              <given-names>A.N.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Wave chaos in the stadium: Statistical properties of short-wave solutions of the Helmholtz equation</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. A</source>
          <year>1988</year>
          <volume>37</volume>
          <fpage>3067</fpage>
          <lpage>3086</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevA.37.3067</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9900043</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B93-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>93.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Bell</surname>
              <given-names>R.J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Dean</surname>
              <given-names>P.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Atomic vibrations in vitreous silica</article-title>
          <source>Discuss. Faraday Soc.</source>
          <year>1970</year>
          <volume>50</volume>
          <fpage>55</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/df9705000055</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B94-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>94.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Bl&#xFC;mel</surname>
              <given-names>R.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Smilansky</surname>
              <given-names>U.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Suppression of classical stochasticity by quantum-mechanical effects in the dynamics of periodically perturbed surface-state electrons</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. A</source>
          <year>1984</year>
          <volume>30</volume>
          <fpage>1040</fpage>
          <lpage>1051</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevA.30.1040</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B95-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>95.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Dunkel</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hilbert</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Consistent thermostatistics forbids negative absolute temperatures</article-title>
          <source>Nat. Phys.</source>
          <year>2014</year>
          <volume>10</volume>
          <fpage>67</fpage>
          <lpage>72</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nphys2815</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B96-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>96.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Hilbert</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>H&#xE4;nggi</surname>
              <given-names>P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Dunkel</surname>
              <given-names>J.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Thermodynamic laws in isolated systems</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>2014</year>
          <volume>90</volume>
          <fpage>062116</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.90.062116</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B97-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>97.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Hertz</surname>
              <given-names>P.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>&#xDC;ber die mechanischen Grundlange der Thermodynamik</article-title>
          <source>Ann. Phys. (Leipz.)</source>
          <year>1910</year>
          <volume>338</volume>
          <fpage>225</fpage>
          <lpage>274</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/andp.19103381202</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B98-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>98.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Gibbs</surname>
              <given-names>J.W.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics</source>
          <comment>Reprint of the 1902 edition</comment>
          <publisher-name>Dover</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Mineola, NY, USA</publisher-loc>
          <year>2014</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B99-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>99.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>L&#xF6;wdin</surname>
              <given-names>P.O.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Shull</surname>
              <given-names>H.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Natural Orbitals in the Quantum Theory of Two-Electron Systems</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev.</source>
          <year>1956</year>
          <volume>101</volume>
          <fpage>1730</fpage>
          <lpage>1739</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRev.101.1730</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B100-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>100.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Bera</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schomerus</surname>
              <given-names>H.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Heidrich-Meisner</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bardarson</surname>
              <given-names>J.H.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Many-Body Localization Characterized from a One-Particle Perspective</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source>
          <year>2015</year>
          <volume>115</volume>
          <fpage>046603</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.046603</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B101-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>101.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Bera</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Martynec</surname>
              <given-names>T.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schomerus</surname>
              <given-names>H.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Heidrich-Meisner</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bardarson</surname>
              <given-names>J.H.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>One-particle density matrix characterization of many-body localization</article-title>
          <source>Ann. Phys.</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          <volume>529</volume>
          <fpage>1600356</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/andp.201600356</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B102-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>102.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Lezama</surname>
              <given-names>T.L.M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bera</surname>
              <given-names>S.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schomerus</surname>
              <given-names>H.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Heidrich-Meisner</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bardarson</surname>
              <given-names>J.H.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>One-particle density matrix occupation spectrum of many-body localized states after a global quench</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. B</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          <volume>96</volume>
          <fpage>060202</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.96.060202</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B103-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>103.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Purcell</surname>
              <given-names>E.M.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pound</surname>
              <given-names>R.V.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>A Nuclear Spin System at Negative Temperature</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev.</source>
          <year>1951</year>
          <volume>81</volume>
          <fpage>279</fpage>
          <lpage>280</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRev.81.279</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B104-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>104.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Ramsey</surname>
              <given-names>N.F.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics at Negative Absolute Temperatures</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev.</source>
          <year>1956</year>
          <volume>103</volume>
          <fpage>20</fpage>
          <lpage>28</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRev.103.20</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B105-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>105.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Torres-Herrera</surname>
              <given-names>E.J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Santos</surname>
              <given-names>L.F.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Local quenches with global effects in interacting quantum systems</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>2014</year>
          <volume>89</volume>
          <fpage>062110</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.89.062110</pub-id>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25019728</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B106-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>106.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Torres-Herrera</surname>
              <given-names>E.J.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kollmar</surname>
              <given-names>D.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Santos</surname>
              <given-names>L.F.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Relaxation and thermalization of isolated many-body quantum systems</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Scr.</source>
          <year>2015</year>
          <volume>T165</volume>
          <fpage>014018</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0031-8949/2015/T165/014018</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B107-entropy-24-01740">
        <label>107.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Santos</surname>
              <given-names>L.F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Borgonovi</surname>
              <given-names>F.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Izrailev</surname>
              <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Onset of chaos and relaxation in isolated systems of interacting spins: Energy shell approach</article-title>
          <source>Phys. Rev. E</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          <volume>85</volume>
          <fpage>036209</fpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.85.036209</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="display-objects">
      <title>Figures</title>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f001" position="float">
        <label>Figure 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>(<bold>a</bold>) The spectral staircase function <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm347"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard model with impurity with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm348"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and a total number of states <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm349"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>96,525</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm350"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm351"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>). The inset shows a magnification of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm352"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with a fit for the smoothed &#x201C;average&#x201D; staircase function <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm353"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> entering the spectral unfolding. (<bold>b</bold>) The normalized density of states (DOS), <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm354"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">&#x3A9;</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, using a bin size of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm355"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> for different interaction strengths of the bath particles. The impurity&#x2013;bath interaction in (<bold>a</bold>,<bold>b</bold>) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm356"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g001.tif"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f002" position="float">
        <label>Figure 2</label>
        <caption>
          <p>The numerically determined nearest-neighbor level statistics <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm357"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard model with impurity (Equations (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD1-entropy-24-01740">1</xref>)&#x2013;(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD4-entropy-24-01740">4</xref>)) (<bold>a</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm358"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<bold>b</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm359"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and (<bold>c</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm360"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the Poisson (exponential) distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm361"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, the Wigner&#x2013;Dyson distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm362"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>WD</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as the fit to the Brody distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm363"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The bin size used is <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm364"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Other parameters are <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm365"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm366"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm367"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g002.tif"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f003" position="float">
        <label>Figure 3</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Statistical distribution function of restricted gap ratios for the Fermi&#x2013;Hubbard model with impurity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm368"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm369"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) for different <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm370"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm371"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the analytical predictions for random matrices within the GOE ensemble (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD10-entropy-24-01740">10</xref>)) and for integrable spectra (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD11-entropy-24-01740">11</xref>)).</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g003.tif"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f004" position="float">
        <label>Figure 4</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Distribution of Shannon entropies (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD15-entropy-24-01740">15</xref>)) as a measure of the complexity of eigenstates of the system for different <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm372"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<bold>a</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm373"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<bold>b</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm374"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<bold>c</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm375"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, and (<bold>d</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm376"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The horizontal lines mark the value <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm377"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>GOE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix">ln</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.48</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> expected for the GOE ensemble. All other parameters as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f002">Figure 2</xref>.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g004.tif"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f005" position="float">
        <label>Figure 5</label>
        <caption>
          <p>The Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm378"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD12-entropy-24-01740">12</xref>)) or scaled Shannon entropy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm379"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD16-entropy-24-01740">16</xref>), left y-axis) as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm380"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The error bars for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm381"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> correspond to the standard deviation by comparison between the fits to <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm382"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with fits to <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm383"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x222B;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the black line corresponds to a fit to a tanh function <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm384"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo form="prefix">tanh</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with the parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm385"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm386"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The error bars in <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm387"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> reflect the width of <italic>S</italic> in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f004">Figure 4</xref> and correspond to the scaled standard deviation around <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm388"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Error of the fit to the Brody distribution as measured by the square root of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm389"><mml:semantics><mml:msup><mml:mi>&#x3C7;</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> function (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD14-entropy-24-01740">14</xref>)) (gray line and right y-axis).</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g005.tif"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f006" position="float">
        <label>Figure 6</label>
        <caption>
          <p>The inverse temperature as a function of the energy of the entire system predicted by the microcanonical Boltzmann entropy (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD18-entropy-24-01740">18</xref>), solid black) and the Gibbs entropy (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD20-entropy-24-01740">20</xref>), blue) as well as the canonical expectation value (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD23-entropy-24-01740">23</xref>), dashed black). The energy is restricted to the interval <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm390"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>min</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>peak</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>FWHM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm391"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> the lower bound where the DOS of the entire system is <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm392"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2265;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>15% of its peak value at <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm393"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>peak</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm394"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>FWHM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> the full-width-at-half-maximum of the DOS. Bath&#x2013;bath interaction strength <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm395"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and impurity&#x2013;bath interaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm396"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f001">Figure 1</xref>b).</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g006.tif"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f007" position="float">
        <label>Figure 7</label>
        <caption>
          <p>The occupation numbers <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm397"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the natural orbitals as a function of their energies <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm398"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>&#x3F5;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD26-entropy-24-01740">26</xref>)) for the eigenstate number <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm399"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>4364</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the total system with energy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm400"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.396</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm401"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm402"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm403"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>). The impurity&#x2013;bath coupling strength is <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm404"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The horizontal error bars indicate the fluctuations <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm405"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>&#x3F5;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD29-entropy-24-01740">29</xref>)). The blue solid line corresponds to the best exponential fit yielding the exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm406"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> in agreement with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm407"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>Boltzmann</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> deduced for this state from Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD19-entropy-24-01740">19</xref>). The inset shows the same plot on a logarithmic scale.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g007.tif"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f008" position="float">
        <label>Figure 8</label>
        <caption>
          <p>The inverse Boltzmann temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm408"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the impurity as a function of energy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm409"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> for the eigenstates of the entire system as obtained from fits to the RDM of the impurity for varying interaction strengths <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm410"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<bold>a</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm411"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm412"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<bold>b</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm413"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm414"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<bold>c</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm415"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm416"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and (<bold>d</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm417"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm418"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The color bar on the right-hand side represents the variance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm419"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm420"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, obtained from the fit. Variances above <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm421"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in red. The lines correspond to <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm422"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained from the microcanonical ensemble Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD19-entropy-24-01740">19</xref>) (solid) and the canonical ensemble Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD23-entropy-24-01740">23</xref>) (dashed), respectively. Other parameters are <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm423"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm424"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm425"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g008.tif"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f009" position="float">
        <label>Figure 9</label>
        <caption>
          <p>The fraction of canonical density matrices <italic>G</italic> obtained for the RDM of the impurity as a function of the Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm426"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (lower horizontal axis, dots) or as a function of the scaled Shannon entropy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm427"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (upper horizontal axis, triangles). The dots are color-coded by the interaction strength <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm428"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> between the bath particles. Horizontal error bars for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm429"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate the uncertainty in the extraction of the Brody parameter, horizontal error bars in <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm430"><mml:semantics><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate the standard deviation of the Shannon entropy (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="entropy-24-01740-f005">Figure 5</xref>). The vertical error bars give the variation of <italic>G</italic> under variation of the threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm431"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Other parameters are <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm432"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm433"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm434"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g009.tif"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f010" position="float">
        <label>Figure 10</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Site representation of the impurity RDM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm435"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2329;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting from the reduction of two adjacent states (<bold>a</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm436"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13,638</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and (<bold>b</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm437"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13,637</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the entire system. In (<bold>c</bold>), we compare the site correlation function <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm438"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD31-entropy-24-01740">31</xref>)) for these two states with the prediction for the ideal Gibbs state (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD30-entropy-24-01740">30</xref>)) (black open circles). The system is in the transition regime between quantum integrable and quantum chaotic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm439"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>). Other parameters are <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm440"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm441"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm442"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g010.tif"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f011" position="float">
        <label>Figure 11</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Distribution of distances <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm443"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD32-entropy-24-01740">32</xref>)) from the (ideal) Gibbs state of the impurity density matrices reduced from the eigenstates <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm444"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> of the large system with energy <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm445"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Shown are only those states with variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm446"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3B2;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. The points are color-coded by the Shannon entropy of their parent state <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm447"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>&#x3C8;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x232A;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. (<bold>a</bold>) Near the quantum chaotic limit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm448"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>); (<bold>b</bold>) in the transition regime between quantum integrability and quantum chaos (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm449"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>). The dashed horizontal line in (<bold>a</bold>) marks the minimal distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm450"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x394;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x3B1;</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> plotted in the inset of (<bold>a</bold>) as a function of the dimension of the Hilbert space <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm451"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm452"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Other parameters are <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm453"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm454"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm455"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g011.tif"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f012" position="float">
        <label>Figure 12</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Variation of the Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm456"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> characterizing the transition from quantum integrability to quantum chaos as a function of the bath&#x2013;bath interaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm457"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> breaking quantum integrability shown for different system sizes. The impurity&#x2013;bath interaction is <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm458"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g012.tif"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="entropy-24-01740-f013" position="float">
        <label>Figure 13</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Universal relation between the fraction <italic>G</italic> of RDMs of the impurity converging to a Gibbs state and the Brody parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm459"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>&#x3B3;</mml:mi></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> for different combinations of system sizes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm460"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm461"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) and bath interaction strengths <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm462"><mml:semantics><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Impurity&#x2013;bath interaction in all systems considered is <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm463"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>IB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. Dashed line to guide the eye.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="entropy-24-01740-g013.tif"/>
      </fig>
    </sec>
    <fn-group>
      <fn>
        <p><bold>Publisher&#x2019;s Note:</bold> MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
      </fn>
    </fn-group>
  </back>
</article>
