Dvořák, W., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2012). Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 186, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.03.005 ( reposiTUm)

Dvořák, W., Ordyniak, S., & Szeider, S. (2012). Augmenting Tractable Fragments of Abstract Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 186, 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.03.002 ( reposiTUm)

Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2011). On the Intertranslatability of Argumentation Semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 41, 445–475. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.3318 ( reposiTUm)

Egly, U., Gaggl, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Answer-Set Programming Encodings for Argumentation Frameworks. Argument and Computation, 1(2), 147–177. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/167366 ( reposiTUm)

Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2010). Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks. Information Processing Letters, 110(11), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2010.04.005 ( reposiTUm)

Besnard, P., Hunter, A., & Woltran, S. (2009). Encoding deductive argumentation in quantified Boolean formulae. Artificial Intelligence, 173(15), 1406–1423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2009.06.006 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., & Spanring, C. (2012). Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2012 (pp. 261–272). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications / IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54496 ( reposiTUm)

Charwat, G., & Dvorak, W. (2012). dynPARTIX 2.0 - Dynamic Programming Argumentation Reasoning Tool. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2012 (pp. 507–508). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications / IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54497 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., Järvisalo, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2012). Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation. In G. Brewka, T. Eiter, & S. McIlraith (Eds.), Proceedings of 13#^{th} int. conf. of Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 54–64). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54155 ( reposiTUm)

Dvořák, W., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic. In E. Hüllermeier, S. Link, T. Fober, & B. Seeger (Eds.), Scalable Uncertainty Management 6th International Conference, SUM 2012, Marburg, Germany, September 17-19, 2012, Proceedings (pp. 85–98). Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_7 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., & Gaggl, S. (2012). Incorporating Stage Semantics in the SCC-recursive Schema for Argumentation Semantics. In R. Rosati & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of 14#^{th} International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (p. 9). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54176 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., Gaggl, S., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2011). Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems. In 19th International Conference on Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (INAP 2011) (p. 14). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53720 ( reposiTUm)

Gaggl, S. A., & Woltran, S. (2011). Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Semantics Based on Conflict-Free Sets. In W. Liu (Ed.), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (pp. 38–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_4 ( reposiTUm)

Brewka, G., Dunne, P. E., & Woltran, S. (2011). Relating the Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and Standard AFs. In T. Walsh (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22#^{nd} Int. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (p. 6). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53672 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., Dunne, P. E., & Woltran, S. (2011). Parametric Properties of Ideal Semantics. In T. Walsh (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22#^{nd} Int. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (p. 6). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53671 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W. (2011). On the Complexity of Computing the Justification Status of an Argument. In S. Modgil, N. Oren, & F. Toni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1#^{st} international Workshop on the Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation (pp. 32–49). http://ijcai-11.iiia.csic.es/files/proceedings/W25-%20TAFA-post-proceedings.pdf. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53699 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., Morak, M., Nopp, C., & Woltran, S. (2011). A Dynamic Programming Reasoner for Abstract Argumentation. In 19th International Conference on Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (INAP 2011) (p. 5). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53730 ( reposiTUm)

Gaggl, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). cf2 Semantics Revisited. In P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, & G. R. Simari (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument (pp. 243–254). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53354 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., & Woltran, S. (2010). On the Intertranslatability of Argumentation Semantics. In Proceedings of the Conference on Thirty Years of Nonmonotonic Reasoning (p. 15). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53356 ( reposiTUm)

Gaggl, S. (2010). Towards a General Argumentation System based on Answer-Set Programming. In M. Hermenegildo & T. Schaub (Eds.), Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming (pp. 265–269). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics / Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.265 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks of Bounded Clique-Width. In P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, & G. R. Simari (Eds.), Proceedings of COMMA 2010 (pp. 219–230). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53323 ( reposiTUm)

Oikarinen, E., & Woltran, S. (2010). Characterizing Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks. In F. Lin, U. Sattler, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Proc. of KR 2010 (p. 11). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53133 ( reposiTUm)

Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Multicut Algorithms via Tree Decompositions. In T. Calamoneri & J. Diaz (Eds.), Algorithms and Complexity : 7th International Conference, CIAC 2010, Rome, Italy, May 26-28, 2010, Proceedings (pp. 167–179). LNCS, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13073-1_16 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2010). Towards Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithms for Argumentation. In F. Lin, U. Sattler, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Proc. of KR 2010 (p. 11). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53170 ( reposiTUm)

Brewka, G., & Woltran, S. (2010). Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In F. Lin, U. Sattler, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Proc. of KR 2010 (p. 10). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53169 ( reposiTUm)

Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth Is not Enough. In F. Lin, U. Sattler, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Proc. of KR 2010 (p. 10). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53171 ( reposiTUm)

Faber, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). A Framework for Programming with Module Consequences. In M. De Vos & T. Schaub (Eds.), Proc. of the 2#^{nd} International Workshop on Software Engineering for Answer Set Programming (SEA’09) (pp. 34–48). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52763 ( reposiTUm)

Faber, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). Manifold Answer-Set Programs for Meta-Reasoning. In A. Herzig & B. Johnston (Eds.), Proc. of the IJCAI-09 Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Action and Change (NRAC’09) (pp. 33–40). ePress of the University of Technology, Sydney. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52762 ( reposiTUm)

Faber, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). Manifold Answer-Set Programs for Meta-reasoning. In E. Erdem, F. Lin, & T. Schaub (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning: 10th International Conference, LPNMR 2009, Potsdam, Germany, September 14-18, 2009, Proceedings (pp. 115–128). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_12 ( reposiTUm)

Baumann, R., Brewka, G., Dvorak, W., & Woltran, S. (2012). Parameterized Splitting: A Simple Modification-Based Approach. In E. Erdem, J. Lee, Y. Lierler, & D. Pearce (Eds.), Correct Reasoning. Springer LNCS. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/27624 ( reposiTUm)

Wallner, J. P. (2012). Computational Aspects of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Doctoral Consortium (KR-DC), Toronto, Canada, Non-EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85370 ( reposiTUm)

Gaggl, S. (2011). Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems. Computational Logic and Knowledge Representation Workshop, Toulouse, Frankreich, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85164 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W. (2011). On the Intertranslatability of Argumentation Semantics. LAF (London Argumentation Forum), London, Großbritannien, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85163 ( reposiTUm)

Gaggl, S. (2009). ASPARTIX: A System for Computing Different Argumentation Semantics in Answer-Set Programming. Advanced Course in Artificial Intelligence ’09, Belfast, GB, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84885 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W. (2009). Argumentation with Bounded Tree-Width. Advanced Course in Artificial Intelligence ’09, Belfast, GB, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84891 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic. (DBAI-TR-2012-79). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37417 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., & Gaggl, S. (2012). Incorporating Stage Semantics in the SCC-recursive Schema for Argumentation Semantics. (DBAI-TR-2012-78). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37418 ( reposiTUm)

Gaggl, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). The cf2 Argumentation Semantics Revisited. (DBAI-TR-2012-77). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37419 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2011). Towards Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation (DBAI-TR-2011-74). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37126 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., Gaggl, S., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2011). Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems (DBAI-TR-2011-70). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/36951 ( reposiTUm)

Gaggl, S., & Woltran, S. (2011). Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Semantics based on Conflict-free Sets (DBAI-TR-2011-68). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/36952 ( reposiTUm)

Dvorak, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). Technical Note: Complexity of Stage Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks (DBAI-TR-2009-66). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35719 ( reposiTUm)