<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Gasteiger, E., & Prettner, K. (2022). AUTOMATION, STAGNATION, AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF A ROBOT TAX. <i>Macroeconomic Dynamics</i>, <i>26</i>(1), 218–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100520000139</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.issn
1365-1005
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/113051
-
dc.description.abstract
We assess the long-run growth effects of automation in the overlapping generations framework. Although automation implies constant returns to capital and, thus, an AK production side of the economy, positive long-run growth does not emerge. The reason is that automation suppresses wage income, which is the only source of investment in the overlapping generations model. Our result stands in sharp contrast to the representative agent setting with automation, where sustained long-run growth is possible even without technological progress. Our analysis therefore provides a cautionary tale that the underlying modeling structure of saving/investment decisions matters for the derived economic impact of automation. In addition, we show that a robot tax has the potential to raise per capita output and welfare at the steady state. However, it cannot induce a takeoff toward positive long-run growth.
en
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
-
dc.relation.ispartof
Macroeconomic Dynamics
-
dc.subject
Automation
en
dc.subject
Economic growth
en
dc.subject
Fiscal policy
en
dc.subject
Robot taxes
en
dc.subject
Stagnation
en
dc.title
AUTOMATION, STAGNATION, AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF A ROBOT TAX