<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Bernreiter, M., Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2022). Abstract Argumentation with Conditional Preferences. In <i>Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2022</i> (pp. 92–103). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220144</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/153153
-
dc.description.abstract
In this paper, we study conditional preferences in abstract argumentation by introducing a new generalization of Dung-style argumentation frameworks (AFs) called Conditional Preference-based AFs (CPAFs). Each subset of arguments in a CPAF can be associated with its own preference relation. This generalizes existing approaches for preference-handling in abstract argumentation, and allows us to reason about conditional preferences in a general way. We conduct a principle-based analysis of CPAFs and compare them to related generalizations of AFs. Specifically, we highlight similarities and differences to Modgil's Extended AFs and show that our formalism can capture Value-based AFs.
en
dc.description.sponsorship
WWTF Wiener Wissenschafts-, Forschu und Technologiefonds
-
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.relation.ispartofseries
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
-
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
-
dc.subject
abstract argumentation
en
dc.subject
conditional preferences
en
dc.subject
principles
en
dc.title
Abstract Argumentation with Conditional Preferences
en
dc.type
Inproceedings
en
dc.type
Konferenzbeitrag
de
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
en
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International