<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Kusa, W., Hanbury, A., & Knoth, P. (2022). Automation of Citation Screening for Systematic Literature Reviews Using Neural Networks: A Replicability Study. In M. Hagen, S. Verberne, C. Macdonald, C. Seifert, K. Balog, K. Norvag, & V. Setty (Eds.), <i>Advances in Information Retrieval. 44th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2022, Stavanger, Norway, April 10–14, 2022, Proceedings, Part I</i> (pp. 584–598). Springer. https://doi.org/10.34726/4261</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/177466
-
dc.identifier.uri
https://doi.org/10.34726/4261
-
dc.description.abstract
In the process of Systematic Literature Review, citation screening is estimated to be one of the most time-consuming steps. Multiple approaches to automate it using various machine learning techniques have been proposed. The first research papers that apply deep neural networks to this problem were published in the last two years. In this work, we conduct a replicability study of the first two deep learning papers for citation screening [8, 16] and evaluate their performance on 23 publicly available datasets. While we succeeded in replicating the results of one of the papers, we were unable to replicate the results of the other. We summarise the challenges involved in the replication, including difficulties in obtaining the datasets to match the experimental setup of the original papers and problems with executing the original source code. Motivated by this experience, we subsequently present a simpler model based on averaging word embeddings that outperforms one of the models on 18 out of 23 datasets and is, on average, 72 times faster than the second replicated approach. Finally, we measure the training time and the invariance of the models when exposed to a variety of input features and random initialisations, demonstrating differences in the robustness of these approaches.
en
dc.description.sponsorship
European Commission
-
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.relation.ispartofseries
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
-
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
-
dc.subject
systematic literature reviews
en
dc.subject
systematic reviews
en
dc.subject
replicability
en
dc.subject
study selection
en
dc.subject
citation screening
en
dc.subject
document retrieval
en
dc.title
Automation of Citation Screening for Systematic Literature Reviews Using Neural Networks: A Replicability Study
en
dc.type
Inproceedings
en
dc.type
Konferenzbeitrag
de
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International
de
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
en
dc.identifier.doi
10.34726/4261
-
dc.contributor.affiliation
The Open University, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the)
-
dc.contributor.editoraffiliation
Leiden University, Netherlands (the)
-
dc.contributor.editoraffiliation
Google (United Kingdom), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the)
-
dc.relation.isbn
978-3-030-99736-6
-
dc.relation.doi
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6
-
dc.relation.issn
0302-9743
-
dc.description.startpage
584
-
dc.description.endpage
598
-
dc.relation.grantno
860721
-
dc.type.category
Full-Paper Contribution
-
dc.relation.eissn
1611-3349
-
tuw.booktitle
Advances in Information Retrieval. 44th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2022, Stavanger, Norway, April 10–14, 2022, Proceedings, Part I
-
tuw.container.volume
13185
-
tuw.peerreviewed
true
-
tuw.relation.publisher
Springer
-
tuw.relation.publisherplace
Cham
-
tuw.project.title
Domänen-spezifische Systeme für Informationsextraktion und -suche