<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Ngayap, U., Paparini, C., Porretta, M., Buist, P., Jacobsen, K. S., Dähnn, M., Hanna, N., Halilovic, D., Świątek, A., & Gajdowska, P. (2023). Comparison of NeQuick G and Klobuchar model performances at single-frequency user level. In <i>Engineering Proceedings</i>. European Navigation Conference 2023, Noordwijk, Netherlands (the). https://doi.org/10.3390/ENC2023-15475</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/197052
-
dc.description.abstract
In this study, the NeQuick G and Klobuchar models are evaluated by monitoring performance issues related to ionosphere activity for single-frequency users. The effects of radio frequency (RF) signal propagation through the ionosphere may have a significant impact on satellite communication and navigation systems because of geomagnetic field geometry near the magnetic equator and in the proximity to the high- and low-latitude zones. An ongoing challenge is determining how accurate the ionospheric models employed by existing Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) are. This work investigates the patterns of total electron content (TEC) fluctuations over distinct zones from 1 January 2019 to 30 June 2022. Measurements are collected at station networks deployed worldwide. Firstly, monthly and seasonal variations of TECs are analysed. Secondly, the TEC ’availability’ parameter, as the percentage of time when the TEC error is compliant with the specification of the Galileo Single-Frequency Ionosphere Algorithm (’NeQuick G’ model), is introduced. The TEC error defines the difference between (a) the model TEC, obtained by either the NeQuick G or the Klobuchar model over a given station, and (b) the reference TEC, based on observations from networks of GNSS receivers. Finally, the position, velocity, and time (PVT), along with broadcast group delays (BGDs) are analysed and the PVT accuracy is compared between the NeQuick G and Klobuchar models. In 3.5 years, the seasonal behaviour of TEC shows maxima during the March and October equinox and minima during the June and December solstice. Moreover, an increase in the TEC values and the amount of TEC errors are visible as we are approaching the next solar maximum. Preliminary results show a larger associated positioning error using the Klobuchar than the NeQuick G model. However, the difference is zone-dependent, most evident in equatorial regions. This collaborative study of the GRC, NMA, TUW, and SRC was performed under the Framework Partnership Agreements (GSA/GRANT/04/2016).
en
dc.description.sponsorship
European GNSS Agency - GSA
-
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
-
dc.subject
NeQuick G
en
dc.subject
Klobuchar
en
dc.subject
position accurracy
en
dc.title
Comparison of NeQuick G and Klobuchar model performances at single-frequency user level
en
dc.type
Inproceedings
en
dc.type
Konferenzbeitrag
de
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International
de
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
en
dc.contributor.affiliation
European Union Agency for the Space Programme (EUSPA), The Netherlands
-
dc.contributor.affiliation
European Union Agency for the Space Programme (EUSPA), The Netherlands
-
dc.contributor.affiliation
European Union Agency for the Space Programme (EUSPA), The Netherlands
-
dc.contributor.affiliation
European Union Agency for the Space Programme (EUSPA), The Netherlands