<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Wang, P., Robinson, A. J., & Papadokonstantakis, S. (2024). Prospective techno-economic and life cycle assessment: a review across established and emerging carbon capture, storage and utilization (CCS/CCU) technologies. <i>Frontiers in Energy Research</i>, <i>12</i>. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1412770</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.issn
2296-598X
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/199224
-
dc.description
Carbon Capture, Storage and Utilization (CCS/CCU) is critical for achieving net-zero emissions. Although the recent surge in CCS/CCU projects announcement, there is a clear gap between announced capacity (around 400 Mt CO₂ per year) and the Net Zero Emissions (NZE) scenario deployment target (around 1 Gt per year) by 2030. This review examines breakthroughs and advancements across both established and emerging CCS/CCU systems with different Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) in various industrial sectors, emphasizing the necessity of prospective assessments for their acceleration and scalability. It examines the development and application of prospective Life Cycle Assessment (pLCA) and prospective Techno-Economic Assessment (pTEA), highlighting their limitations and importance of their outcomes in decision-making processes. Differences between the evolving dynamics of the technological systems (foreground) and the evolution of the overall socioeconomic system (background) are discussed. Incorporating scenario data from Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) into pLCA and pTEA reveals an iterative relationship that significantly influences the outcome of both the environmental assessments and the economics of large-scale production of the CCS/CCU systems under study. This, in turn, could reshape investment strategies towards advanced technologies, necessitating their consideration within the evolving structure of IAMs. It is concluded that the inherent limitations of CCS/CCU technologies at an early stage of development require quantitative uncertainty analysis and demand robustness, interdisciplinary collaboration, policy intervention, and data transparency. The rigorous evaluative frameworks are key for developing economic, environmental and climate policies and enable well-informed decisions across rapidly evolving sectors. A framework is proposed in this review, outlining a multistep process that includes a series of databases and open-source tools to interface pTEA and pLCA with enhanced IAMs for CCS/CCU, demonstrating its potential to improve decision-making and policy development.
-
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.publisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
-
dc.relation.ispartof
Frontiers in Energy Research
-
dc.subject
carbon capture and storage
en
dc.subject
prospective life cycle assessment
en
dc.subject
integrated assessment models
en
dc.subject
prospective techno economic assessment
en
dc.subject
carbon capture and utilisation
en
dc.title
Prospective techno-economic and life cycle assessment: a review across established and emerging carbon capture, storage and utilization (CCS/CCU) technologies
en
dc.type
Article
en
dc.type
Artikel
de
dc.type.category
Review Article
-
tuw.container.volume
12
-
tuw.journal.peerreviewed
true
-
tuw.peerreviewed
true
-
tuw.researchTopic.id
E6
-
tuw.researchTopic.id
E4
-
tuw.researchTopic.id
E3
-
tuw.researchTopic.name
Sustainable Production and Technologies
-
tuw.researchTopic.name
Environmental Monitoring and Climate Adaptation
-
tuw.researchTopic.name
Climate Neutral, Renewable and Conventional Energy Supply Systems
-
tuw.researchTopic.value
20
-
tuw.researchTopic.value
30
-
tuw.researchTopic.value
50
-
dcterms.isPartOf.title
Frontiers in Energy Research
-
tuw.publication.orgunit
E166-06-3 - Forschungsgruppe Prozesssystematik für nachhaltige Ressourcen
-
tuw.publisher.doi
10.3389/fenrg.2024.1412770
-
dc.date.onlinefirst
2024-07-26
-
dc.identifier.eissn
2296-598X
-
dc.description.numberOfPages
26
-
tuw.author.orcid
0009-0002-1196-4035
-
tuw.author.orcid
0009-0002-4124-4346
-
dc.description.sponsorshipexternal
European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme
-
dc.relation.grantnoexternal
101075727
-
wb.sci
true
-
wb.sciencebranch
Chemische Verfahrenstechnik
-
wb.sciencebranch
Biologie
-
wb.sciencebranch
Industrielle Biotechnologie
-
wb.sciencebranch.oefos
2040
-
wb.sciencebranch.oefos
1060
-
wb.sciencebranch.oefos
2090
-
wb.sciencebranch.value
50
-
wb.sciencebranch.value
35
-
wb.sciencebranch.value
15
-
item.languageiso639-1
en
-
item.openairetype
review article
-
item.grantfulltext
restricted
-
item.fulltext
no Fulltext
-
item.cerifentitytype
Publications
-
item.openairecristype
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
-
crisitem.author.dept
E166-06-3 - Forschungsgruppe Prozesssystematik für nachhaltige Ressourcen
-
crisitem.author.dept
E166-06-3 - Forschungsgruppe Prozesssystematik für nachhaltige Ressourcen
-
crisitem.author.dept
E166-06 - Forschungsbereich Bioressourcen und Pflanzenwissenschaften
-
crisitem.author.orcid
0009-0002-1196-4035
-
crisitem.author.orcid
0009-0002-4124-4346
-
crisitem.author.parentorg
E166-06 - Forschungsbereich Bioressourcen und Pflanzenwissenschaften
-
crisitem.author.parentorg
E166-06 - Forschungsbereich Bioressourcen und Pflanzenwissenschaften
-
crisitem.author.parentorg
E166 - Institut für Verfahrenstechnik, Umwelttechnik und technische Biowissenschaften
