<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Trost, P., Eder, M., & Kartnig, G. (2024). Shuttle-based or robotic compact storage and retrieval system? In G. Kartnig, N. Zrnic, & Bošnjak Srđan (Eds.), <i>MHCL 2024</i> (pp. 155–158). TU Wien, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Institute of Engineering Design and Product Development. https://doi.org/10.34726/7139</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/203870
-
dc.identifier.uri
https://doi.org/10.34726/7139
-
dc.description.abstract
This study investigates and compares the performance of shuttle-based storage and retrieval (SBS/RS) and robotic compact storage and retrieval systems (RCS/RS). SBS/RS, featuring lifts and shuttles, excel in high-speed storage and retrieval, achieving significant throughput efficiencies, particularly in high-demand scenarios. In contrast, RCS/RS enable high storage densities. The performance evaluation is based on existing analytical models, which integrate cycle time models and queueing theory. Results indicate that SBS/RS outperforms RCS/RS, particularly in smaller systems. However, with a low number of vehicles, RCS/RS demonstrates superior performance. These insights assist in selecting the appropriate system based on specific operational requirements.
en
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.rights.uri
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
-
dc.subject
SBS/RS
en
dc.subject
RCS/RS
en
dc.subject
Warehousing
en
dc.subject
Automated Storage Systems
en
dc.subject
Material Handling
en
dc.subject
Cycle time models
en
dc.subject
Queueing theory
en
dc.title
Shuttle-based or robotic compact storage and retrieval system?
