<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">van Berkel, K. (2024, October 16). <i>Deontic Explanations Through Dialogue and 5 Key Challenges</i> [Conference Presentation]. ENIGMA 2024, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/204297
-
dc.description
Deontic explanations answer why-questions concerning agents’ obligations (permissions, rights, etc). Normative systems are notoriously conflict sensitive, making contrastive explanations pressing: “Why am I obliged to do 𝜙, despite my (seemingly) conflicting obligation to do 𝜓?” In this talk, I present a model of contrastive explanatory dialogues for the well-established defeasible reasoning formalism Input/Output logic. The work is a collaboration with Christian Strasser (published at ArgXAI2024). We harness recent results on the correspondence between I/O reasoning and formal argumentation to leverage existing dialogue methodology to model contrastive deontic explanations. Our model distinguishes between successful, semi-successful, and unsuccessful deontic dialogues by identifying four subdialogues: i) explaining the claim, ii) rejecting the foil, iii) justifying the contrastive link, and iv) demonstrating the explainer’s coherence. This work is the first of its kind and for this reason I will highlight and discuss 5 key future challenges for deontic explanations through dialogue.
-
dc.description.sponsorship
FWF - Österr. Wissenschaftsfonds
-
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.subject
Normative reasoning
-
dc.subject
Explainable AI
-
dc.subject
nonmonotonic logics
-
dc.subject
computational argumentation
-
dc.subject
dialogue models
-
dc.title
Deontic Explanations Through Dialogue and 5 Key Challenges
