<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Hao, L., Cuesta, F., & Tretyakov, S. (2024). Comparison of Simplistic System-Level RIS Models and Diffraction-Theory Solutions. In <i>2024 18th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP)</i> (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.34726/7300</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/204401
-
dc.identifier.uri
https://doi.org/10.34726/7300
-
dc.description.abstract
We discuss and compare two recently published path-loss models for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) derived from the electromagnetic and communication theory points of view. The electromagnetic model considers the RIS as a whole, taking into account field interactions of all metasurface elements, whereas the communication model is based on an assumption that each array element is an independent relay. The estimations given by the two models are rather different but, surprisingly, we find that the simplistic model gives the same result as the electromagnetic calculation for perfectly functioning anomalous reflectors if one replaces the effective areas of the unit cells by their geometrical areas, scaled by the corresponding angular factors. Simulation results validate our analysis and show the numerical differences between the two models when we vary the frequency and the number of elements in RISs.
en
dc.description.sponsorship
European Commission
-
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.rights.uri
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
-
dc.subject
Intelligent Reflecting Surface (IRS)
en
dc.subject
path-loss model
en
dc.subject
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface (RIS)
en
dc.title
Comparison of Simplistic System-Level RIS Models and Diffraction-Theory Solutions