<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Szeles, B., Holko, L., Parajka, J., Stumpp, C., Stockinger, M., Komma, J., Rab, G., Wyhlidal, S., Schott, K., Hogan, P., Pavlin, L., Strauss, P., Schmaltz, E., & Blöschl, G. (2024). Comparison of two isotopic hydrograph separation methods in the Hydrological Open Air Laboratory, Austria. <i>Hydrological Processes</i>, <i>38</i>(7), Article e15222. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15222</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.issn
0885-6087
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/205745
-
dc.description.abstract
Exploring the contributions of new and old water to runoff during precipitation events in agricultural catchments is essential for understanding runoff generation, solute transport, and soil erosion. The aim of this study was to investigate the variability in the isotopic composition of precipitation and runoff in the 66 ha agricultural catchment in Austria, in the Hydrological Open Air Laboratory (HOAL), in order to compare two isotope hydrograph separation methods. The classical two-component (IHS) and the ensemble hydrograph separation (EHS) were applied to multiple large events in May–October of 2013–2018 using δ¹⁸O and δ²H. The peak flow new water contributions obtained by IHS were compared with the average new water fraction from EHS. The average new water fraction calculated with EHS based on regular weekly sampling was close to zero, which can be explained by the large diffuse groundwater discharge into the stream between the events. When only investigating events with high temporal resolution sampling, the results suggest that EHS provided average new water fractions during peak flows (0.46 ± 0.04 for δ¹⁸O, 0.47 ± 0.03 for δ²H) that were close to the averages obtained by IHS (0.47 for δ¹⁸O, 0.50 for δ²H). New water fractions tended to be higher for larger rainfall intensities. High peak flow new water fractions could be explained by the agricultural land use and soils with low permeability promoting overland flow generation and by some of the tile drainage systems contributing to the delivery of water. In conclusion, a weekly sampling frequency was not sufficient in the HOAL but instead high-resolution sampling during events was necessary to estimate the average new water contributions during events. While EHS may be a more robust approach compared to IHS, as it relaxes some of the assumptions of IHS, IHS can provide information on the variability of new water contributions of individual events.
en
dc.description.sponsorship
FWF - Österr. Wissenschaftsfonds
-
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.publisher
WILEY
-
dc.relation.ispartof
Hydrological Processes
-
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
-
dc.subject
agricultural catchment
en
dc.subject
experimental catchment
en
dc.subject
isotopic hydrograph separation
en
dc.subject
rainfall-runoff events
en
dc.subject
stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen in water
en
dc.title
Comparison of two isotopic hydrograph separation methods in the Hydrological Open Air Laboratory, Austria