<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Özkan, T., Lavric, I., Hochreiner, G., & Pfeifer, N. (2025). Automated 3D Modeling vs. Manual Methods: A Comparative Study on Historic Timber Tower Structure Assessment. <i>Remote Sensing</i>, <i>17</i>(3), Article 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030448</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.issn
2072-4292
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/212264
-
dc.description.abstract
The present study focuses on the preservation of historic timber constructions, crucial cultural heritage assets that demand effective structural health monitoring (SHM) to ensure safety and integrity. SHM aims to detect and evaluate potential structural deviations that may compromise performance, requiring both detailed geometric data acquisition and 3D modeling. For this purpose, contactless tools such as photogrammetry, laser scanning, and other topographic methods are employed to gather point cloud data. This research utilizes a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) to generate 3D models of the historic timber tower of St. Michaeler church in Vienna. A novel automated modeling method is compared with two manual modeling approaches. The first is a traditional as-designed structural model created in Dlubal RSTAB software, and the second is a manually generated as-built model created using a scan-to-BIM application in Revit. While the first model is based on 2D plan documents created from the TLS point cloud, the second and automated models use the point cloud as direct input. The findings demonstrate that this automated model significantly enhances early-stage structural assessment efficiency, providing reliable insights into structural conditions with minimal processing time. This research underscores the potential of automated 3D modeling in preliminary structural assessments of historic timber structures.
en
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.publisher
MDPI
-
dc.relation.ispartof
Remote Sensing
-
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
-
dc.subject
Historic timber towers
en
dc.subject
3D Reconstruction
en
dc.subject
Point Clouds
en
dc.subject
Structural assessment
en
dc.title
Automated 3D Modeling vs. Manual Methods: A Comparative Study on Historic Timber Tower Structure Assessment
en
dc.type
Article
en
dc.type
Artikel
de
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International
de
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
en
dc.contributor.affiliation
Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest, Romania