<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Kanellopulos, K., Ladinig, F., Emminger, S., Martini, P., West, R. G., & Schmid, S. (2025). Comparative analysis of nanomechanical resonators: sensitivity, response time, and practical considerations in photothermal sensing. <i>MICROSYSTEMS & NANOENGINEERING</i>, <i>11</i>(1), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-025-00879-6</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.issn
2055-7434
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/215644
-
dc.description.abstract
Nanomechanical photothermal sensing has significantly advanced single-molecule/particle microscopy and spectroscopy, and infrared detection. In this approach, the nanomechanical resonator detects shifts in resonant frequency due to photothermal heating. However, the relationship between photothermal sensitivity, response time, and resonator design has not been fully explored. This paper compares three resonator types - strings, drumheads, and trampolines - to explore this relationship. Through theoretical modeling, experimental validation, and finite element method simulations, we find that strings offer the highest sensitivity (with a noise equivalent power of 280 fW/Hz¹/² for strings made of silicon nitride), while drumheads exhibit the fastest thermal response. The study reveals that photothermal sensitivity correlates with the average temperature rise and not the peak temperature. Finally, the impact of photothermal back-action is discussed, which can be a major source of frequency instability. This work clarifies the performance differences and limits among resonator designs and guides the development of advanced nanomechanical photothermal sensors, benefiting a wide range of applications.
en
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.publisher
SPRINGERNATURE
-
dc.relation.ispartof
MICROSYSTEMS & NANOENGINEERING
-
dc.subject
nanomechanical resonators: sensitivity
en
dc.subject
response time
en
dc.subject
practical considerations in photothermal sensing
en
dc.title
Comparative analysis of nanomechanical resonators: sensitivity, response time, and practical considerations in photothermal sensing