<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Baumann, C., Yerranagu, M., Zhang, W., Deshpande, A., Maier, S., Gössinger, S., Soshi, M., Bleicher, F., & Pfefferkorn, F. E. (2025). Comparison of three hybrid metal additive-subtractive manufacturing processes. <i>CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY</i>, <i>74</i>(1), 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2025.04.074</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.issn
0007-8506
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/222021
-
dc.description.abstract
The objective of this work is to compare three different hybrid metal additive-subtractive manufacturing processes to enable decision-making and future research. This was achieved by producing the same artifact out of 316L stainless steel with - Friction Surfacing, Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing, and Laser Powder Directed Energy Deposition. Key process outcomes including cycle time, resource consumption, distortion, energy consumption, microstructure, hardness, and tensile strength were analyzed. It was observed that: Friction Surfacing demonstrates higher hardness due to its solid-state nature; Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing offers lower cycle times and resource consumption; and Directed Energy Deposition provides near net shape geometries.
en
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.publisher
ELSEVIER
-
dc.relation.ispartof
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
-
dc.subject
Additive manufacturing (AM)
en
dc.subject
Hybrid manufacturing
en
dc.subject
Stainless steel
en
dc.title
Comparison of three hybrid metal additive-subtractive manufacturing processes
