dc.description.abstract
This thesis examines the interaction between architecture, its enclosed public spaces and people’s movement within them. A particular focus is set on what is referred to as urban ‘Raum-Fuge’. These narrow, often hidden areas frequently arise from specific necessities in architectural structures and are primarily perceived as connecting routes. However, their spatial characteristics, such as their proportions and spatial structures, also have a significant influence on people’s behavior in public space. The most central research questions are as followed: How do Raum-Fugen work in the Viennese ‘Durchhaus’ (Czeike, 2004, p. 110.), considering their transformation into spaces that can be actively experienced through its network of massive, static structural structures and human appropriation of areas, which typically aren’t very visible? How can we perceive and rethink our understanding of public space by exploring these existing yet often overlooked urban qualities in new ways?While nowadays, these narrow, tube-like connecting spaces are part of public space, historically, they often had a different function. Specifically, they served private or industrial purposes and were not necessarily accessible to the public (cf. Hasmann, 2019, p. 7.). With advancing urban development, many Raum-Fugen became public paths that guide and often steer us unconsciously, either through their spatial narrowness, their sight-lines or their materiality. This often unconscious control to steer us through certain spaces, manifests itself in various aspects: for example, in how we move, where we move to and what speed we move at. Raum-Fugen have a decelerating effect and function often very differently from other public urban zones.The theoretical basis of this thesis draws on concepts developed by Henri Lefebvre, Doreen Massey, Georg Simmel, Jane Jacobs, Lucius Burckhardt, Michel de Certeau, Valie Export, Trisha Brown and Edward T. Hall, who deal with the relationship between space, perception and social practice. In addition to theoretical analysis, practical methods are also used: mapping techniques, photo series and the documentation of movements. Thus, using three selected Viennese Raum-Fugen as an example, concrete urban Raum-Fugen are examined and their spatial qualities visualised. The aim of the work is to create a deeper understanding of the atmospheric and social significance of Raum-Fugen. These passageways, which have existed for a long time and emerged from a very specific practical need, are understood in the context of this work as special spaces of experience and specific areas of public space. Thus, this investigation, which is both analytically and theoretically based on the hands-on, practice-oriented and experimental, versus the theoretical contribution to expanding our understanding of movement in public space and developing new approaches to the design of urban spaces.
en