<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Kmen, C., Navratil, G., Kattenbeck, M., & Giannopoulos, I. (2026). Evaluating human–machine collaboration through a comparative analysis of experts, machine learning, and hybrid approaches in real estate valuation. <i>Scientific Reports</i>, <i>16</i>, Article 4044. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34099-9</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.issn
2045-2322
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/226113
-
dc.description.abstract
Accurate prediction of real estate prices remains a major challenge due to dynamic market conditions
and the limitations of traditional valuation methods. Empirical studies that directly compare human
experts, machine learning (ML) models, and hybrid approaches are rare. This study examines the
predictive accuracy and efficiency of an XGBoost-based ML model, real estate experts, and a hybrid
human–machine approach. A model was trained using 21,736 real estate transactions from Vienna
(2018–2022). We then conducted an experimental procedure with 13 experts who evaluated newly
built apartments sold in 2023 under three conditions: limited information, state-of-the-art expert
methods, and collaboration between experts and ML model. The results show that the ML model
achieves accuracy comparable to that of experts while significantly reducing the time required for the
task. Within the hybrid approach, experts were able to achieve the highest accuracy in comparison to
other methods. These results underscore the potential of human-ML collaboration.
en
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.publisher
NATURE PORTFOLIO
-
dc.relation.ispartof
Scientific Reports
-
dc.subject
Human subject study
en
dc.subject
Expert assistance
en
dc.subject
Real estate price prediction
en
dc.subject
Transaction data
en
dc.subject
machine learning algorithms
en
dc.subject
Model evaluation
en
dc.title
Evaluating human–machine collaboration through a comparative analysis of experts, machine learning, and hybrid approaches in real estate valuation