<div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry">Scaffino, G., Resnick, M., & Neu, J. (2026). Gatling: Rapid-Fire Consensus from Parallel Composition. In A. Kiayias & M. Kyropoulou (Eds.), <i>8th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2026)</i>. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2026.4</div>
</div>
-
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/231629
-
dc.description.abstract
Consensus protocols form the core of blockchains and other replicated state machines, ensuring that all correct nodes process the same totally ordered log of input transactions. In fault-free executions, performance is driven by the good-case transaction latency – the time between a transaction becoming known to all nodes and its confirmation by the consensus protocol – which depends on both how frequently proposals are made and, once made, how quickly they are confirmed. While prior work has established tight lower bounds on confirmation latency that modern protocols already achieve, it remains open whether the inter-proposal time can be further reduced below the state-of-the-art of one network delay. We introduce Gatling, an atomic broadcast protocol that achieves arbitrarily small inter-proposal times under rotating leader schedules; in particular, smaller than the network delay. Gatling runs multiple parallel instances of a black-box atomic broadcast protocol and staggers their proposal schedules to generate proposals in faster succession than state-of-the-art protocols. A deterministic interleaving rule merges the outputs of these instances into a single global log. We analyze the effects of head-of-line blocking caused by crashed leaders, and derive Gatling’s optimal number of parallel instances. We further study the impact of Gatling on predictable validity and present two variants that retain this property. Finally, our experiments confirm that Gatling can be used with off-the-shelf component protocols to achieve low latency without fine-tuning the component protocol for minimum latency.
en
dc.language.iso
en
-
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
-
dc.subject
Distributed Systems
en
dc.subject
Byzantine Fault Tolerance Consensus
en
dc.subject
Parallel Composition
en
dc.subject
Inter-Proposal Time
en
dc.title
Gatling: Rapid-Fire Consensus from Parallel Composition
en
dc.type
Inproceedings
en
dc.type
Konferenzbeitrag
de
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International
de
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
en
dc.contributor.affiliation
Anza (New York), United States of America (the)
-
dc.contributor.affiliation
Microsoft Research New York City (United States), United States of America (the)
-
dc.contributor.editoraffiliation
University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the)
-
dc.contributor.editoraffiliation
University of Essex, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the)