EITER, T., GEIBINGER, T., MUSLIU, N., OETSCH, J., SKOČOVSKÝ, P., & STEPANOVA, D. (2023). Answer-Set Programming for Lexicographical Makespan Optimisation in Parallel Machine Scheduling. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 23(6), 1281–1306. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068423000017
E192-03 - Forschungsbereich Knowledge Based Systems E192-02 - Forschungsbereich Databases and Artificial Intelligence E192-50 - Services des Instituts E056-13 - Fachbereich LogiCS E056-17 - Fachbereich Trustworthy Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems
-
Journal:
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
-
ISSN:
1471-0684
-
Date (published):
26-Jan-2023
-
Number of Pages:
26
-
Publisher:
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
-
Peer reviewed:
Yes
-
Keywords:
Answer Set Programming; Parallel Machine Scheduling; Lexicographical Optimisation
en
Abstract:
We deal with a challenging scheduling problem on parallel machines with sequence-dependent setup times and release dates from a real-world application of semiconductor work-shop production. There, jobs can only be processed by dedicated machines, thus few machines can determine the makespan almost regardless of how jobs are scheduled on the remaining ones. This causes problems when machines fail and jobs need to be rescheduled. Instead of optimising only the makespan, we put the individual machine spans in non-ascending order and lexicographically minimise the resulting tuples. This achieves that all machines complete as early as possible and increases the robustness of the schedule. We study the application of answer-set programming (ASP) to solve this problem. While ASP eases modelling, the combination of timing constraints and the considered objective function challenges current solving technology. The former issue is addressed by using an extension of ASP by difference logic. For the latter, we devise different algorithms that use multi-shot solving. To tackle industrial-sized instances, we study different approximations and heuristics. Our experimental results show that ASP is indeed a promising knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) paradigm for this problem and is competitive with state-of-the-art constraint programming (CP) and Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP) solvers.