Last Things that Remain. Daedalic Tongues and Technical Objects: On the Place of Eschatology through the Lens of Contemporary Natural Philosophy. The Greek word “eschaton” means the last thing that remains. How to think of such lastness, how to think of such remaining? The eschaton is involved wherever notions of crisis, apocalypse, and post-ness set the agenda for orienting our thinking. It is evident how strongly it features in our technological narratives, like those around climate and AI, but how do we find it employed in current mythopoetic imaginaries around the digital more specifically, like Heidegger’s and Harman’s Geviert, Virilio’s Postindustrial Eschatology, Simondon’s Eschatology of Technical Objects, Yuk Hui’s Cosmo Technics or Cacciari’s The Withholding Power? My book The Digital, a Continent? Nature and Poetics (2024) takes cryptographic interest in such adventures in exuberance, and considers an informal “marriage” between architectonics and metaphysics taking place amidst its scenes of conversing theoretically – this is what in this lecture I want to "chat" about: I want to make a proposal of how to approach the digital in a natural philosophy way, by means of activating an architectonic play around the incommensurability between Nature and Poetics.